the russian leader. democrat saying we have not face the prospect of armageddon since kennedy and the missile crisis. i don t think there s an ability to use a nuclear weapon and not end up with armageddon. look what you just heard from the president, this is stark language. you do not normally hear this from u.s. presidents. not now. and it comes as the u.s. considers how to response to a range of potential scenarios. for more let s bring in jeremy diamond. has there been any escalation from russia that prompted these remarks? reporter: there s no question there is an elevated risk of nuclear war based on the language we ve heard from the russian president but u.s. officials say there is nothing that has changed that nothing that they have seen that has changed in russia s nuclear posture. last week we heard the russian president talking about any and all means necessary to defend russian territory as he talked about the use of nuclear weapons but what we haven t hea
was to women you belong. i wonder what you think the message to women is with this ig report? it s sending a very negative message. it s sending a message not just to women but everybody in the military, don t stand up to these maga lies and attacks, don t defend your force otherwise you ll be punished for it, that does send a negative message to women in the military for sure and everybody else. i think it s very demoralizing, since my column came up, i saw commentary on twitter and elsewhere saying what is the army thinking? they need to get it right. they need to make clear that general donohoe did not do anything wrong. the army ig didn t approve, clearly, of what they felt was general donohoe s snark in some cases. do they have a point? oh, come on. this is such mild snark by the standards of twitter, so