about how to proceed, when to proceed? well, the last thing that a prosecutor gets to do that the prosecutor has complete control over, neil, is file charges. after that the case is in court and the judges is a more important actor than the prosecutor is. i do think you raise an excellent point in that president trump now, i think, has a very strong argument that his due process rights are being really constricted by virtue of the fact that all of these prosecutors are descending on him in a short period of time. now, they can all say they re independent actors, but smith doesn t have that luxury. he s filed another indictment. so i think he s very vulnerable, smith is, to the argument that, you know, you re now going to try to rush president trump to trial on the january 6th case, what is called the january 6th
substantially true. substantially true. today is a day of ustice, substantially true. today is a day ofjustice, justice substantially true. today is a day ofjustice, justice for substantially true. today is a day ofjustice, justice for those - substantially true. today is a day ofjustice, justice for those brave men of the sas who stood up and told the truth about who ben roberts smith is, a war criminal, a body and liar. ., smith is, a war criminal, a body and liar. . ., , ., , ., , liar. the trial was a first of its kind in australia. liar. the trial was a first of its kind in australia. an - liar. the trial was a first of its kind in australia. an elite - liar. the trial was a first of its | kind in australia. an elite sas soldier, robert smith sued three newspapers that had accused him of war crimes. the trial centred on events during 2009 and 2012, as australia s military continue its role in the allied effort to defeat baton above. it heard claims he had pushed a hunk cut
introducing the next generation 10g network only from xfinity. all right, so we are all the future starts now. watching very carefully special counsel jack smith and his criminal investigation into trump squirreling away hundreds of classified documents in mar-a-lago. bloomberg today reporting, according to people familiar with the matter, that not only is the special counsel close to wrapping up its investigation, smith is, quote, poised to
seems keen to me is the testimony of aaron corcoran one of the lawyers who end up signing the document saying nothing to see here, and according to mar-a-lago, this washington post reporting, it seems like maybe they were hiding the stuff from corcoran, who was attempting to, in good faith, comply with a subpoena. that s what the reporting does seem to point to. it also sounds like trump s lawyers have now compounded some kind of defense, a white paper, to the department of justice, to the special counsel. in which they maybe seem to be trying to shift some blame onto corporate saying, well, he just into a good job. he didn t take enough time to review the documents. again, it s another one of these, you know, try and choose a defense as you go. and see what sticks, generally, you have to commit to one. one of things i was, notable obstruction was what was identified in this search warrant. that there was probable cause
later, the fbi executed, famously, a search warrant at mar-a-lago in august of that year, where the uncovered, oh look at this, roughly an additional hundred classified documents. the deputy chief of the u.s. attorney s office for the state of new york and she joins me now. good to have you here. well, it doesn t seem like a great set of facts. if you are the lawyer to be hired on the defense side of this. what do you make of them? it could be coincidence. there are such things in life but it sounds like special counsel s office is gathering different pieces of proof and that s one of them, the sheer coincidence of the timing and the reporting after those documents were remove trump s lawyer called the prosecutors and said why don t come on down. so would happen the next day. but we have also got, according to reporting, 50 pages of his former attorneys notes that