have very few people know how we took painstaking, it was a corset, so he couldn t move. so oswald was able to get all three shots two of which hit him. you re saying the back brace kept him up right. couldn t hit to the floor. jackie was trying to pull him. so he would have death been on the floor. everybody else was. because the theorists will look at the zapruder film. we go through the whole thing in killing kennedy, how the bullet s landed. oswald fires three shots, one miss, two hits, do you believe in a single bullet theory. it s the magic bullet theory
and what direction is the president s head pushed, not backwards, but slightly forward. indicating the shot from the rear are lee harvey oswald was. i would hesitate to say it s absolutely 100% impossible. but it is highly improbable. could a single bullet wounded president kennedy and connolly? the single bullet theory is the most controversial aspect of the report. if the warren commission couldn t prove that one shot hit both men, that means there were two shooters. if so, there is a conspiracy. he claimed the sec shot was a bullet. they argue that a bullet would have had to make a left turn and right turn in mid air. the reality is connolly was not seated directly in front of kennedy. if you figure out the align.
president? there are so many interesting questions and problems that come from the film. we believe so much in the image. we believe so much in the sort of ultimate truth of film and of images. then they become our memory. is it impossible that the bullet would have gone through president kennedy, gone through governor connally and not suffered any more damage than is shown in this photograph? i would hesitate really to say that it is absolutely 100% impossible. but it is highly improbable. could a single bullet have wounded both president kennedy and governor connally? the single bullet theory has perhaps become the most controversial aspect of the report. if one bullet couldn t shoot men, it meant there were two shooters and there was a conspiracy. the conspiracy theorists claim that the second shot was a magic bullet. they argue that a bullet would have had to make a right turn then a left turn in mid-air. the reality is that connally was
the whole question, how much time did oswald have to shoot the president? there are so many interesting questions and problems that come from the film. we believe so much in the image. we believe so much in the sort of ultimate truth of film and of images and they become our memory. is it impossible that the bullet would have gone through president kennedy, gone through governor connally and not suffered any more damage than is shown in this photograph? i would hesitate really to say that it absolutely 100% is impossible, but it is highly improbable. could a single bullet have wounded both president kennedy and governor connally? the single bullet theory has become perhaps the most controversial of the report. if the warren commission couldn t prove that one shot had hit both men it meant there were two shooters. ipso facto there s a conspiracy. the conspiracy theorists claim that the second shot was a magic bullet.
a single bullet theory has become perhaps the most controversial aspect of the report. if the warren report couldn t prove that one shot killed the men, then there were two shooters, and there s a conspiracy. the conspiracy they re wrists claim the second shot was a magic shot. it would have had to make a right turn and left turn in midair. it wasn t se president wasn t seated directly in front of connolly. if you look down, as i did and as others did who conducted the on-site test and had the automobile placed in the commission, it is perfectly plain, i submit to you, that bullet that exited from president kennedy s throat would have had to have struck the automobile, which it did not, or someone else in the automobile. to believe it didn t hit