so andy warhol s iconic images may be works of art, but at least one famous work of art also violated copyright law. of course that s the ruling from the supreme court. the justices siding with a prominent photographer, whose image was used to create warhol s silk screens of prints. now warhol s estate had argued the silk screen images were fundamentally different. they were based on but fundamentally different. they were art. they therefore did not violate copyright laws. seven of the justices rejected that reasoning. interesting alliance here, though. one of the court s most liberal justices, elena kagan was joined by the chief justice jean-roberts in dissent. they argue the decision will, quote, stifle creativity of every sort. it will impede new art and music and literature. it will thwart the expression of new ideas and the attainment of new knowledge. it will make our world poorer. thanks for joining us. ac 360 start news. good evening. tonight the clearest sign yet
The Supreme Court ruled on Thursday the foundation for the late Andy Warhol infringed on a photographer s copyright when he used a series of silk screens based on an image of the late singer Prince.
New Delhi [India], April 22 (ANI/NewsVoir): Pune-based art gallery Vida Heydari Contemporary (VHC) is all set to take part in the India Art Fair, leading event in New Delhi exhibiting contemporary art.
Pune-based art gallery Vida Heydari Contemporary (VHC) is all set to take part in the India Art Fair, leading event in New Delhi exhibiting contemporary art.