it will be a legal homicide because in our country doesn t exist any type of treatment. thank you for your time. despite that granular detailed personal testimony from these young patients about personally getting letters from the government telling them they would have to leave this country, stop their medical treatment and go to a place where they would die, republicans today, their argument, their approach to the hearing was don t worry, this isn t really happening. this is a show trial, this is a show hearing, none of this is real. kids like isabel and jonathan don t have anything to worry about. republicans argued whatever the government did in sending the kids and families letters, it was a mistake. of course it will be dealt with promptly. the u.s. would never deport critically-ill people, especially not to places where they couldn t continue to get the treatment keeping them alive. that s crazy. you are just trying to make the trump administration look bad. that might have be
sorry for that. on my point of view thinking that deporting sick kids like me it will be a legal homicide because in our country doesn t exist any type of treatment. thank you tofor your time. despite that granular detailed personal testimony from these young patients about personally getting letters from the government telling them they would have to leave this country, stop their medical treatment and go to a place where they would die, republicans today, their argument, their approach to the hearing was don t worry, this isn t really happening. this is a show trial. this is a show hearing. none of this is real. kids like isabelle and jonathan don t have anything to worry about. republicans argued whatever the government did in sending the kids and families letters, it was a mistake. of course it will be dealt with promptly. the u.s. would never deport critically ill people, especially not to places where
ainsley: by their own liquor and put it in the room. people were so young. they said natural causes? they were young. steve: griff, thank you very much. move on to washington, d.c. democrats left wing they have a problem. they would like to seat president of the united states impeached. nancy pelosi doesn t wants that to happen. brian: only 41% american people support it. steve: that s why nancy pelosi doesn t want that to happen. she did essentially the next best thing. she had jerry nadler put on a show hearing where they called in from the watergate ear remarks john dean, who is the president president nixon s attorney wound up as part of a cover-up, spent four months in prison. nonetheless, the democrats, you know, support it because they are trying to draw parallels between this president and president nixon. the prurks were having no part of it. watch. this this committee is now hearing from the 1970s, and they want their star witness back.
what do you expect in terms of the everyday given your committee there? my understanding is the entire judiciary committee gets to see it. as soon as it s available, i will read the whole thing. i will say this is how these accommodations are supposed to work. you shouldn t have held them in contempt. i m glad we are working towards how this is supposed to go. we will get access to more of the report. we will read everything that s available to us and continue to move forward. i do find it unfortunate we had to hold another of what i would say show hearing in judiciary to hold the attorney general in contempt. jerry nadler says this evidence is key evidence and some of robert mueller s most important files. is it conceivable to you that you will see something that you will change your mind on this? ly do something that i would recommend my chairman do as
counsel, don pc mcgahn, jerry nadler just issued a statement saying, the committee will convene as planned tomorrow morning and mr. mcgahn is expected to appear, as legally required. most people don t expect him to be there at 10:00 a.m.. i don t think that s going to happen. the white house has said no. clearly, the committee could hold don mcgahn in contempt, but the white house and the department of justice has said that you can t compel mcgahn to testify about his conversations with the president. look, there are lots of people who believe you can t put the toothpaste back in the tube after he testified before bob mueller for 30 hours. but mcgahn s not going to show up tomorrow. jerry nadler knows it. and maybe they re just going to have another show hearing. is there any chance mcgahn defies the white house and does show up. he s a private citizen? not tomorrow. i don t know the answer, though i would lean no, wolf. because whether or not mcgahn