nobody is barring them from having their say. it s about what coates phrase was, in this fashion. and when you are simultaneously bashing the probe, saying it s unsubstantiated, shouldn t stand, there are no arguments, it s unconstitutional, and asking the special counsel to accept your terms for an interview, how do you think those things go together? peanut butter and jelly or peanut butter and sardines? it depends whether the special counsel is caring about the court of public opinion in making determinations as to what this interview is going to look like. they re human beings, right, jim? that factors into all of it, and the court of public opinion matters to all the folks involved in this thing. well, to answer your question, it s peanut butter and sardines, chris. and the actual court of law has an interest in this as well because if you think about it, they are going to try to make some argument rudy giuliani and jay sekulow at some point, once mueller is frustrated
it s about what coates phrase was, in this fashion. and when you are simultaneously bashing the probe, saying it s unsubstantiated, shouldn t stand, there are no arguments, it s unconstitutional, and asking the special counsel to accept your terms for an interview, how do you think those things go together? peanut butter and jelly or peanut butter and sardines? it depends whether the special counsel is caring about the court of public opinion in making determinations as to what this interview is going to look like. they re human beings, right, jim? that factors into all of it, and the court of public opinion matters to all the folks involved in this thing. well, to answer your question, it s peanut butter and sardines, chris. and the actual court of law has an interest in this as well because if you think about it, they are going to try to make some argument rudy giuliani and jay sekulow at some point, once mueller is frustrated by the absence of good faith negotiations and
first lady in texas right now. we ll get back to her and get more of an update. malika nia henderson, let me get your thought on these two women. the president s wife, the president s daughter clearly are playing a significant role. one question is why did it take the first ladies to stir some compassion in this president, right? ted cruz came to this decision that this was a policy that shouldn t stand. he presumably didn t need his wife to convince him. it s almost like compassion is sort of outsourced to the women, the first lady in this case and ivanka trump. i agree with sara. this idea that ivanka trump said, we really need to focus on this. i think she works at the white house every day. and i think this policy has been going on for about six weeks and i don t know that she has been out front, certainly not publicly, in trying to do something about it. it s a story that has been brought to us by pictures and sounds, in images, but it s not going to be one that s solved wi
the trump family talk today agents of the russian government. and given the fact that they have lied about the extent of their contact with the russian government, it stands to reason that we might not yet know the whole story about potential collusion. let me read the tweet that he posted earlier this morning once again. listen to this. the single greatest witch-hunt in american history continues. there was for collusion. everybody including the dems knows there was no collusion. and yet on and on it goes. russia and the world is laughing at the stupidity they are witnessing. republicans should finally take control. when he says take control, what does he mean, if your opinion, what does he mean by republicans should finally take control? well, i mean, republicans can t take control of an fbi investigation. i assume he says that republicans should allow him to fire robert mueller, that they shouldn t stand in the way of that. we have legislation pending, for instance, that would g
mr. trump will find that out over a period of time, but it shouldn t stand in the way of the obvious and correct things of seeing whether we can find a way to make the nuclear deterrent more stable, to lead away from accidents, buzzing ships and things like that, is not helpful and that needs to be something that we put our foot down on, just as we have on the question of intervention in the u.s. electoral process. and those are important signals to send to mr. putin as well as to tell him we re keeping the pressure on but when we have the pressure on we ought to point to the open doors we can walk through that can bring something like win/wins for both sides. let me go further down that road, what s the harm in donald trump doing what he s doing, waiting until he sees the intelligence community report that the white house ordered on this hacking before making any declarative statements in i don t understand what he means when he says he knows things about hacking other people don t