dana: hold the technology above their head? i if you keep them busy enough and give them a lot of activities my daughter and son would rather do color and crayon time with dad dana: if you re traveling i try to keep the games educational. i won t allow them on youtube. i control as much as they see. you know, you can t leave them alone on social media. it s not the baby sitter. that s the one concern. kids get exposed to things not quite ready to see and shouldn t see. dana: what about for somebody like mark zuckerberg who started this in his dorm room. i heard his success described as catastrophic one time. like catastrophic success and now the company is big. he had been in a credibility deficit for a while. now everyone is coming after him. the left, the right, all types of groups. what do you think about his decision to now have more of a public posture for the company?
sdny doing the raid is already a big deal. we ve already established that, chuck. having potential recordings about the president, is it going to be difficult to decide what s attorney-client privilege and what s not? i was talking to somebody today who said in their interactions with michael, he wasn t really acting as a lawyer for the president. trump organization had a general counsel. i know when i had to deal with legal issues with the campaign, ask them legal questions or ask the organization legal questions, i didn t go to michael cohen. i went to somebody else. so i don t think it is going to be that difficult. it has to be done carefully because you don t want the filter team passing to the clean team stuff they shouldn t see. that s a problem. prosecutors have been doing this for decades. we know how to do this. and if there is a document that s questionable, it might be privileged, you can leave it on the other side of the wall or you can go to the judge and seek her gui
subpoenas issued last august. earlier on america s newsroom, oversight chair trey gowdy told me why this request is so very important. most of what i have read is already in the public domain. i really want to know what information did you view credible enough to launch a pretty serious counter intelligence investigation? when did you learn it? how did you vet it? how did you determine whether or not it was reliable or not? all of that is in a paragraph that i can t read. sandra: so why not just turn this document over, governor? mike: there is no reason. i think that the members of the fbi should be held in contempt of congress. this is a serious thing. and nobody can say there is stuff in there they shouldn t see. devin nunes has the highest classification of security because of his position. he can see anything anybody in the entire u.s. government can see for them to pretend it s got to somehow be redacted. it s utter nonsense. they are hiding something and time for us to f
relationship to the film. and the way that the film influenced and affected american life. you know, it had such a pervasive effect, not only on the assassination debates, but also on sort of political culture and american culture and film and art. and in terms of mediaethics, deep questions about what the american public should and shouldn t see. so the sort of pervasive nature of the film, i think that whole story hadn t been told in a clear way. and that was really what i set out to do. author of 26 seconds alexandra, thank you for joining us today. thanks for having me. i m betty nguyen. next on a.m. joy, what s being called a political coup in a state that voted for donald trump. he kids to get a repair estimate. liberty did what? yeah, with liberty mutual all i needed to do to get an estimate was snap a photo of the damage and voila! voila! (sigh) i wish my insurance company had that. wait! hold it. hold it boys.
for about a month. he entered after raising a million dollars in less than 30 days in the summer. and he points out in a piece in politico he is running a real campaign, he has an actual platform and an architecture, he s doing events and raising money, writing america needs a minimum wage, a living wage. needs to start subsidizing oil companies and restore safety to the financial system and immigration policy that promises some of the hardest-working americans they can become citizens. now, i ve got to say, there is no earthly logic as far as i can tell for a democratic presidential debate to give a podium slot to, say, jim webb and lincoln chafee but not lawrence lessig. it appears like the democratic national committee or a cable news network are essentially unnecessarily playing gatekeeper about what ideas people should and shouldn t see. they ve got a whole stage.