i have to tell you i am now picturing a character from gulliver s travels. you have him moving the goalpost here. pretty useless answer about the shifting stories. what s your reaction to that? well, alex, this is donald trump s personal attorney rudy giuliani, and he s going to go to bat for his boss, president trump. i would actually want someone that defended me every step of the way. absolutely you want that. but noelle, is giuliani effectively defending the president? well, i think there so many
violation because he s trying to hide it, showing he knows there s something wrong here, and it also can be an element of obstruction of justice, that he is trying to influence other witnesses, if he is trying to influence the jury with lies. reporter: but experts caution there s also the possibility all of these shifting stories may actually not prove obstruction of justice simply because we don t know everything trump and his legal team have told to prosecutors and trump and his team could make the case that the president was confused about the law, confused about what obstruction really means, even though he s always had lawyers to tell him what that means. brian todd, thank you very much. now, just ahead, a migrant child detained by u.s. border agents dies in custody. the trump administration is on the defensive as we re learning new details about what happened.
benefit for their testimony. so one of the things that you have to ask yourself, does their testimony line up with testimony of other witnesses, documents or other evidence, and here, i think that david peck ser someone who is not biased against president trump, but in fact, a ally of president trump, and so he would have enhanced credibility there. is also reporting that another employee of a publisher of ami was also involved in the the meetings, and alan weissenberg might also have more corroborating testimony. and as we heard from matt, the shifting stories can demonstrate some evidence of willfulness, and you only lie when you know you have done something wrong, and so in combination, all of these things are pointing to michael cohen is credible according to fact-finders
ones damaging to brett kavanaugh and nothing else she seems to remember, and there s also been, for instance, her husband said in the washington post christine ford had mentioned brett kavanaugh s name in that therapy session. she testified under oath that the therapist notes don t have brett kavanaugh s name in it. fred and then the story that she s afraid to fly when she s alone to close costa rica and the east coast, the shifting stories, they don t add up. we re talking about comedies like, someone s future with brett kavanaugh. he has two little girls at home and we need to make sure this information is credible and right. i really agree with that and joe and lisa, my take on that, if anything, she is being exploited by the democrats and the next thing i want to talk about is about the litter size asian and what democrats have done because it goes beyond this case and i think it s incredibly damaging to our whole society. anyway, stick around for that. coming up, more on the
now more than two years after the fact, two questions stand out. was the sit down evidence of criminal wrongdoing? and amid the shifting stories, did the president play a role in the cover-up? it s one of the most enduring mysteries of this episode is did donald trump know about it? he has said over and over again he did not know this took place, and donald trump, jr. has said the same, including essentially under oath to congress. an e-mail exchange in which donald trump, jr. infamously responded if it s what you say, i love it. the question has always been, did candidate donald trump know about that meeting before it happened? it s hard for me to believe that donald trump, jr., in that circumstance would not communicate with his father and say, dad, look what i got. so the mueller team appears to be looking at this in terms of attempted collusion. why did they accept the meeting, what was the state of mind of