Superintendent thank you for being here today all right. Richard carranza and i want to welcome yet another great partner in addition to superintendent on the mayors Education Leadership council thats charter schoncellor i want to thank to our state senator by way of there is football being played there is games games on the field but another field sometimes you have to play Serious Games someone who has been made tackles in sacramento who is game manship made us proud because senator leno has been making dont plays up that to mr. Chaprotect the accreditation senator leno thank you. clapping. i told you, i like mayors i also like restortired mayors mayors know what i am going introduce because they went through the same thing and good advice but a great mayor as a matter of fact, one of the greatest mayor a mayor, i had explained to other newer mayors walking through your beautiful city hall who knew who did that with the gold trimming the mayor i yet to know other mayors with a bridge
The item passes. Thank you. If we can call item 2, please. Item number 2, ordinance amend thing Building Code to require any existing building with a place of public accommodation either to have all primary entries and path of travel into the building accessible by persons with disabilities or to receive from the city ao a determination of equivalent facilitation, technical infeasibility or unreasonable hardship. Er thank you very much, so i am the sponsor of this item and i just wanted to say that its nice that we have soufp groundbreaking pieces of legislation in Budget Committee today. This one particularly has to do with accessibility and all of our places of public accommodation here in San Francisco and it may seem that we have a simple piece of legislation before us today, but it took us about two years or more to work on this to get it to a place where all parties feel comfortable with this legislation including our Small Business community, so first of all, i would like to tha
Directors and Parking Authority Commission Call roll. Director brinkman director borden director ramos director rubke chairman nolan mr. Chairman we have quorum pier 70 great, thank you. Please be advised the ringing of and use of cell phones, phones, devices are prohibited at this meeting. Please be advised that the chair may order the removal from the meeting room microphones set on vibrate caused interruption we respectfully ask they be turned off item 4 approval of the minutes. Motion to approve. Any further discussion . The is have it. Communications directors please be advised there will be no closed session today and also posted online an item are regarding 330 stockton it is not on the agenda today to we apologize for any confusion to the public 3 may have caused it will be brought to you at a future meeting any unfinished bus. Director heinecke and i on the board knows a fatality only Market Street about a month ago and rally by the community before this meeting a letter septe
Commissioner president wolfram commissioner president honda commissioner hasz commissioner johnck commissioner johns commissioner matsuda and commissioner pearlman thank you, commissioners commissioners, that places you under your is general Public Comment at this time, members of the public may address the commission on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the commission except agenda items. With respect to agenda items, your opportunity to address the commission will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting. Each member of the public may address the commission up to three minutes. I do have one speaker card. Georgia swedish. Go ahead. Thank you. Good afternoon. Im georgia swedish here last time i just want to bring up the issue i think there are two issues occurring now with regards to the facadism the main we know but i think it is concerning when a building is basically defendants next in order and an ocher stark facade with
Speakers talk about attempts in florida to purge voter rolls of suspected noncitizens. On federal Court Rulings voter laws and the prospects for a unified National Registration system. Heres a look at the event. They put this in a little bit of context as to why people can come to very different conclusions on the same topic. Republicans generally have a view of the purpose of an election, which a certainty. The purpose of holding an election is that we know will one and we are clear as who at one and there is no question. Clings up theat electoral process, that gives up that certainty, is a burden worth paying, because that is the purpose of an election. Thatrats generally believe it involves participation. That anything limits the participation of all those who could vote from voting undermines the legitimacy of the outcome, even if that means that the results may be a little messy on the edges. These are both legitimate decisions. This is a perspective towards the purpose of the ele