say the most racist things you could so people would think rand stands for that. bill: later, that same man was seen at a rally supporting mr. paul s opponent, mr. conway. now, you have to be very careful with tape on the net as we saw with the sherrod story. this whole thing is disturbing. joining me from washington laura ingraham, author of the big best seller the obama diaries. laura, dirty tricks are pretty much everywhere these days because of the internet because it s easy for anyone to get tape, embarrassing tape, we have seen it time and time again, put it on youtube or facebook or whatever they are putting it on and then it goes all over the place. i don t think the full impact of this has been felt dirty tricks. i mean, it can get out-of-control easily. am i wrong? in the obama diaries, bill, i have a chapter called demonizing the enemy. look, i focus on what the left does to demonize the tea party
they said you were going to say the most racist things you could so people would think rand stands for that. bill: later, that same man was seen at a rally supporting mr. paul s opponent, mr. conway. now, you have to be very careful with tape on the net as we saw with the sherrod story. this whole thing is disturbing. joining me from washington laura ingraham, author of the big best seller the obama diaries. laura, dirty tricks are pretty much everywhere these days because of the internet because it s easy for anyone to get tape, embarrassing tape, we have seen it time and time again, put it on youtube or facebook or whatever they are putting it on and then it goes all over the place. i don t think the full impact of this has been felt dirty tricks. i mean, it can get out-of-control easily. am i wrong? in the obama diaries, bill, i have a chapter called demonizing the enemy. look, i focus on what the left does to demonize the tea party
general in california found they were selectively edited, exculpatory material that would have made a.c.o.r.n. look better that was left out. the brooklyn district attorney came to the same conclusions. we have no idea to this day what happened with the a.c.o.r.n. tapes. thank you. both of his major stories, the sherrod story and the a.c.o.r.n. story turned out he had to do a little bit of correction or clarification in both cases. that s what we ve been doing here in our second edition trying to clarify. we had a good narrative tonight. i think everybody heard what happened. it s a tricky one. a few rough edges. we got it tonight. thank you joan walsh and ken vogel. coming up, congress holds a hearing on charlie rangel s alleged violations. for the democrats who promised to drain this swamp after republican ethics violations, the political stakes are very high. you re watching hardball.
helping the guy. she winds up realizing he s being hurt as badly as many black farmers. she saves his farm. that s left out. ultimately she gets him the help and then she tells this wonderful story about black and white people needing to come together and realizing what they have in common and often it s poverty or classç or disadvantage. so that s what s so perverse, chris, is that he took what would have been a really great racial story and turned it into the opposite of what it was. that s clearly what he intended to do. what surprises me and remains the little bit of well, rough edge to this, maybe it was baddetitying on the part of people that wanted to hurt her. here s the problem. at the end of the tape, breitbart certainly in a malicious way, but he kept if that little bit part about her redemption and recognizing it s class, not race. how do we explain that in this world of white versus black or he s all bad or they re all good? why would he leave in that part? why wouldn
excerpted from it. so the question as to why the exculpatory language at the end that tells the moral of the story from her perspective and shows her revelation is left in is a good one and perhaps it shows how amateurish this person was and further raises questions about breitbart s own commitment to journalism they ll did not see or did not feel the need to pursuit fact, did not feel the need to figure out what this person s motives were or how it was edited. joe, can i make your point? i think whatever wentç out on this guy s blog got this woman fired. so the impression left by both the prelude where it said here s a federal official abusing her authority racially, even with that little bit of redemptive part at the end, the impact was it scared the obama administration somewhere in the ag department confirmed by somebody in the white house get her out of here. this was a devilish plot to screw this administration. here s an obama, here s the president obama talking today. i m n