he says that when sdny was investigating him several years ago they seize various devices pursuant to a search warrant and that when those devices were returned to him that they were wiped karine or corrupted. i was a prosecutor in that office for 12 years. that s not how it works. the devices generally are preserved, and when you are searching the devices, when you see the materials, you then review the materials that have already been seized in a separate form. the devices themselves are preserved. so this idea that he couldn t have produced the discovery, it doesn t make sense and i would imagine that the plaintiffs here will pursue additional discovery to find out if there s anything to this. i suspect there is not. andrew weissmann, please, link this up with what donald trump said this morning in his
it s schemes like this that are giving families a break from the financial worries over the summer holidays. do you like tomatoes? elaine dunkley, bbc news. the high court has ruled that prince harry can sue the publisher of the sun for unlawful information gathering. but the judge decided that time had run out for the duke of sussex to pursue his claims about phone hacking. tom symonds is at the high court. tom, was this expected? well, prince har had tom, was this expected? well, prince harry had six tom, was this expected? well, prince harry had six years tom, was this expected? well, prince harry had six years under tom, was this expected? well, prince harry had six years under the - tom, was this expected? well, prince harry had six years under the law- tom, was this expected? well, prince harry had six years under the law to i harry had six years under the law to claim about phone hacking in the court and many of the allegations he made go back several decades, so the quest
could come up. cancelled over the potential for for foreign registration act. there s no guarantees, there s no inoculation legal settlements here. all bets are off, aren t they? they are. think about it. the two big questions are the diversion program for a gun background check. he lied on a gun background check and saying he wasn t using drugs when he was using cocaine. if he was honest, he couldn t have bought a gun. he bought a gun. we saw it waived on in videos on his computer. the other is this issue of broad immunity. when the deputy u.s. attorney handle this case answered the judge by saying the investigation is underway and he could be charged with fara, that s when hunter biden s attorney stood up and said the deal is off then. they were counting on broad
as harry arrived, just the briefest of waves towards the waiting press. an institution in his evidence yesterday he said had affected every aspect of his childhood. how much more blood will stain their typing fingers before someone can put a stop to this madness, he told the court. he went on saying, journalists were responsible for causing a lot of pain, upset. prince harry alleges the mirror newspaper group used unlawful methods, including phone hacking to write stories about him, which mgn denies. he said thejournalist stories about him, which mgn denies. he said the journalist behind this piece was known to employ private investigators. the mgm barrister responded, he couldn t have had his mobile phone hacked at the time, because he didn t have one. this morning, prince harry argued this article from 2006 about a visit to a strip club contain details about the time and length of calls that were so specific, it must have been
voting apparatus and election equipment in a few counties in georgia. so there s a lot of exposure here, and it s all about which people can be connected through the evidence to these various pieces of the conspiracy? i think that s why we re hearing now about the potential use of racketeering charges and expanding into other states. it s not because fani willis is going to indict a crime that occurred in another state, but if she wants to bring racketeering charges, she s going to want to show a pattern. and she can show a pattern in georgia alone, but if she shows a pattern across a number of states, as representative lofgren was talking about, as katie was talking about, that s a really powerful case. and it shows there s no mistake here, there s no accident. this was vast. and pieces are in georgia but it s part of something a lot bigger. of course, trump, he couldn t have stayed in power in georgia. of course the plan was rolled