the case that they have won. one wonders though the case that they have won. one wonders though how this could affect prince harry s court case. weill. prince harry s court case. well, prince harry s court case. well, prince harry prince harry s court case. well, prince harry is prince harry s court case. well, prince harry is the prince harry s court case. well, prince harry is the other - prince harry s court case. well, l prince harry is the other claimant in this case. there are lots of other cases involving prince harry, but in this case he is making a similar argument, so he couldn t have bought a case to court within six years because the evidence wasn t known about, it was only disclosed quite recently in 2021. in his case there will be a further legal argument injuly at this court for thejudge to make legal argument injuly at this court for the judge to make any more progress so we ll have to wait. any trials are likely to be next year but i think it s fair to say that
it s not the proud boys, it s donald trump. the defense team for enrique tarrio and other members of the far extremist group say they are not to blame for what happened at the capitol it was the former president who said fight like hell or they weren t going to have a country anymore. tarrio is being scapegoated. he couldn t have predicted what would happen enrique was an entertainer, a lover, a razzle dazzler. but if convicted, he could face 20 years in prison joining me is justice reporter ryan riley we just talked about the potential consequences that could be out there for donald trump regarding 2020 these are the consequences that some are facing who actually were involved in the insurrection what s the latest from this trial, from these closing arguments? well, you know, after more than three months of the trial
car, which was several miles away, parked on the side of the road. the car was not running. the gas cap was off and hanging. the implication being that he was walking home to his father s house. the pathologist had issued a report that it was a hit and run. she said that the reason she thought it was a hit and run is because his body was found in the road. when they told me that stephen got hit by a car, you know, i told them, i said, no, he couldn t have. growing up, me and stephen, we walked the roads all the time. it didn t matter what time it was. we d sneak out the house and walk down our rural country road. 3:00, 4:00 in the morning, if a car came, we would jump in the woods. you know, we were more afraid of what was on the road than what was in the woods.
someone who has an addiction problem, but after you have been found guilty to stand before the judge and say i didn t do it, to continue to proclaim your innocence, how does that impact a judge deciding the state did not seek the death permanent. how does that impact the judge? acceptance of responsibility is a factor. so had he said i did it, i m so sorry, that might have led to a lower sentence. the if he admits to it, he can t appeal it. he can t come back and say down the road i didn t do this and my conviction should be overturned. so if he plans on appealing, as most defendants do, he couldn t have admitted the responsibility. anything jump out at the trial that there s grounds for appeal? yes, absolutely. the statements with respect to the prior krooims he had done.
when they told me that stephen got hit by a car, you know, i told them, i said, no, he couldn t have. growing up, me and stephen, we walked the roads all the time. it didn t matter what time it was. we d sneak out the house and walk down our rural country road. 3:00, 4:00 in the morning, if a car came, we would jump in the woods. you know, we were more afraid of what was on the road than what was in the woods. because stephen always said, you know, nobody s going to kidnap his sexy behind. so we always were cautious. stephen was different. when he got to high school, that s when people started noticing that he wasn t like them. the family knew ever since stephen was a little that he