records show a profound breach of a defendant s word that he would protect information and the security of the united states. the judge in this case david hennessey also went on to talk about who this defendant had hurt by releasing those troves of classified documents online saying who did he put at risk? he could make a list as long as a phone book. soldiers, medical personnel, ukrainian personnel, ukrainian soldiers. we don t know how many people he put at risk. he went on to say that the government has said if you disclose this information, you put the united states at serious risk and the defendant s response was, i don t give a expletive. you could fill in the blank there. and the defense argued that the defendant in this case did not try to flee when he was arrested. he also brought up the defendant s attorney also brought up that his parents had put up their homes as collateral. but the judge, he acknowledged that saying i m aware of all of that, but at the end of
conspiracy is born in hell. rarely have angels as witnesses. so that is the type of people that you re working with. and again, i ve lied to sources. i ve manipulated sources. but at the end of the day, i extract information, i don t provide them with information. now there are certain circumstances some people were asking me today about why would he provide information about an imminent arrest. there are people that there are investig investigators in our department that would share that information with the defendant in hopes that this individual or to arrange for that individual to turn themselves in. to make it peaceful. so no one gets killed. so i don t know, again, it comes down to what were shane la mond s motivation and his intention and i think he has some certainly has to answer some questions. that is really very interesting. michael fanone, thank you so much. i appreciate it. and i guess we re going to hear some answers from shane lamond
to those questions that you have. could i have one more thing? yeah. i think it is important to note as well that shane la mond was in charge of the intel unit and the intel unit was at least in part responsible for the metropolitan police department s posture on january 6. and to remind everyone what the posture was that day, we were at full deployment. we had ever single officer that was working, we aware of the potential for violence on january 6. at least a week in advance. you guys were way ahead of where a lot of other people were. a lot of other law enforcement. and military agencies. very interesting. mike fannon, great to have you. thank you. a key biden ally telling cnn the real reason why president biden wants to shake up the voting calendar heading into 2024, candor coming your way. and the snack dad. all using chase to keep up with their f finances. the coach helps save goals here, because she saved for r soccer camp there.
he said great to here. i can t say it officially but i support you all and i don t want to see your reputation dragged through the mud. so you re saying it is possible that this is shane lamond doing his job and he doesn t like the proud boys, he s you re saying it is a possibility he was saying that to enreek a tarrio as part of his efforts to get information? absolutely. and again, i don t know. a lot of this comes down to what was lieutenant la mond s motivation throughout this. was he naive? was he dumb, or was he dirty? i think that, you know, some of the questions that i have after reading through the indictment was shane lamond documenting these interactions with tarrio? was he disseminated that information throughout the department and why was he