had that stack of news stories or op-ed opinions that this is not a valid prosecution and the de doesn't have evidence but that kind of rhetoric is going to fade away as this trial gets underway because of the particular indictment that was filed against him. >> this is a case solely about falsifying business records and the de has cited in the indictment actual physical evidence that they claim to have checkbooks checks, checks, stubs, receipts, entries into business ledgers. there's nothing political about the case, and i think the public will see that as the evidence is presented so karen, let me ask you i think mr. tropics breast surprise the other day on truth, social look, memory serves that he didn't have an unlimited number of peremptory challenges to dismiss individuals who couldn't be fair. >> that's obviously not the procedure. each side gets a limited number i didn't devise