learned in these hearings is i m sorry, it s better for the committee to have people on tape than life because the committee has been able to pick and choose, and that s why i think it s better that they had cipollone on tape as opposed to live so they can find the useful parts of the testimony and get rid of any sort of filibustering and hamming and hiring. the same thing with this joker in prison. they don t need him live. he can just rot and wait. appreciated, thanks. coming up next, how japan is coping with the almost unimaginable, the assassination of shinzo abe, and the fact he was shot in a society with very few firearms and only a handful of gun deaths per you, sometimes fewer than that. later, a month and a half since their level of work murdered, the people in texas have just a lot of collecting information lies, coverups, finger-pointing, invasioion fro
kagen, who is really smart. thanks for having me. they are one of my clients that filed one of these briefs. it was shocking to see. i would not call it misinformation. i think the justices are fully aware of the facts and the circumstances. i think the problem is they were hamming for the cameras and viewed themselves for a particular position. it speaks like they felt like they were in the minority. i think they know fully well what is fully well what s going on here. some of that rhetoric and factual material that isn t in the record is unusual in a court hearing. we are taught as lawyers not to come to the court and tell them what you saw on television last night as an argument. that s a violation of court rules. justices apparently are free to do exactly that and import emotional and fact-free arguments there. it undermines the credibility of the court. i thought the conservative
they are one of my clients that filed one of these briefs. it was shocking to see. i would not call it misinformation. i think the justices are fully aware of the facts and the circumstances. i think the problem is they were hamming for the cameras and viewed themselves for a particular position. it speaks like they felt like they were in the minority. i think they know fully well what s going on here. some of that rhetoric and factual material that isn t in the record is unusual in a court hearing. we are taught as lawyers not to come to the court and tell them what you saw on television last night as an argument. that s a violation of court rules. justices apparently are free to do exactly that and import emotional and fact-free arguments there. it undermines the credibility of the court. i thought the conservative justices, i m hoping five solid votes and i think justice
0 please set your dvr so you never miss an episode of hannity. let not your friday night hearts be troubled. the ingraham angle with laura ingraham up next. i hope you have a great weekend! laura: i m laura ingraham. this is the ingraham angle from washington tonight. a shockingly tepid jobs report has the biden white house wreeling and spinning. larry kudlow is here. how the democrats are looking to use january 6th to drive a stake right through the heart of our democracy. senator tom cotton explains that. raymond arroyo cleans up the january 6th hysterics. it is all ahead. the supreme court heard oral argument it s for vaccine mandates for large employers and for health care workers and providers. the osha rule states that businesses with more than 100 or more workers must either require employees to be vaccinated or submit to weekly testing and masking in the work place. opposing this mandate are 27 states and the national federation of independent business. the fact is, lon
this from hamming again and it involves trying to look at what was the industry standard? what should have been done? who were the crew members that owed that duty of care to the people who were injured, and one woman killed, and ultimately who was responsible for making sure that they implement and execute those safety protocols? now, in the law, jurors, if that were to go to trial, i there are well aware you can have what s called comparative negligence, erica, where it s not one person left holding the bag but people who had a hand in the lublt. that s ultimately the direction this is going but the traj i was overwhelming. if there was notice and they knew to do better. laura coats, always good to have you with us. thank you. . thank you. progressives aggressively pushing back on plans to vote on the bipartisan infrastructure deal today. without a vote on president biden s social spending plan, now it appears speaker pelosi is