it was at this private members club one night lastjune that chris pincher drunkenly groped two men. the report describes that physical contact as unwanted, upsetting and deeply inappropriate , and it said it had a significant impact on those involved. the committee goes on to say this was an. they say it. and the report concludes that. chris pincher today again apologised for his actions. the committee has recommended his suspension from the house for eight weeks. in the commons, labour asked when mps would get to vote on the sanction. the committee found that the actions of the member significantly affected the public s perception of this house. i m afraid to say that shamefully, it appears the conservative party have protected and even promoted him, despite a
the committee found that the actions of the member significantly affected the public s perception of this house. i m afraid to say that shamefully, it appears the conservative party have protected and even promoted him, despite a previous investigation into his conduct. the honourable member concerned has ten days to appeal, and we must let due process run its course. but she knows that we take these matters incredibly seriously. this is yet another aftershock of the chaotic collapse of borisjohnson s government. now there s the prospect of a fifth by election triggered by a tory mp. that s a headache rishi sunak could do without. today, another reminder of the type of behaviour westminster doesn t want to be associated with chris pincher, another mp leaving parliament under a cloud. leila nathoo, bbc news, westminster.
chooses. what has changed about that? they did not raise these concerns with us directly during the process of this bill. they wait until after the scottish parliament has passed it, and they exercise not something to take it to court, but a veto. , something to take it to court, but a veto. , ., . ., , . . veto. it s outrageous. so what are ou auoin veto. it s outrageous. so what are you going to veto. it s outrageous. so what are you going to do? veto. it s outrageous. so what are you going to do? can veto. it s outrageous. so what are you going to do? can you - veto. it s outrageous. so what are you going to do? can you confirm| you going to do? can you confirm that you will seek a judicial review? that you will seek a udicial review? ~ ., , ., review? we will do everything to stand u- review? we will do everything to stand up for review? we will do everything to stand up for and review? we will do everything to stand up for and defend - review? we will do everything to
people who he needs votes from detest the idea that the january 6th mob was stopped, and so it was politics again. how does it read for you that the man who wants to be speaker, and all but one republican refused to come out and join in that 142nd moment of silence for those who died? it s stunning and shameful. i of course, was standing right there. and i have to admit to you, do you know what they were doing at the very same time? they were having a telephone conference call around mccarthy s attempt at leadership. i likened it to a football coach. could you imagine a football coach afraid to go into the locker room to talk to his team, to rally the support for what they needed to do together to unify them? mr. mccarthy could not meet them in person, and much more shamefully, didn t take the time to come out front to those