Rights, people should be allowed to do this. I would say that by Banning Jones and by shadow banning many others, facebook and others are now effectively becoming a publisher, and that means because they are taking editorial decisions come they should be open to being sued as other Media Organizations are. Tammy now i would argue, we are all trying to find some balance here because we clearly see its unfair and it ranges from congressman being shadow band, we are trying to find a free market, especially with the Mainstream Media being 85 liberal. We see that push. But we are the content and social media which gives us an edge. We would suggest though that some of the argument by twitter, they are saying that some of these comments violate standards. If we open it up to lawsuits for libel, wouldnt that make it even more difficult to have speech . Wouldnt more people be banned
and more people be suspended . No. If you are a platform for all ideas, you are not a part professional. On the
and more people be suspended? no. if you are a platform for all ideas, you are not a part professional. on the one hand they claim, we are not open to libel because we let everybody give their opinio opinion. now in a very sinister way, they have a way of starting to ban and a shadow band people. for example on facebook, an organization that i have spoken for. i ve been to their events. they do great work. they do amazing work. they are videos have been seen by tens of millions of people. they now on facebook have 88 of their videos that are now very much put to the back of the list. they are very hard to access including ones on christianity for goodness sake. so we have gone way beyond the bounds. what s needed now is a bill of rights for people using