Rights, people should be allowed to do this. I would say that by Banning Jones and by shadow banning many others, facebook and others are now effectively becoming a publisher, and that means because they are taking editorial decisions come they should be open to being sued as other Media Organizations are. Tammy now i would argue, we are all trying to find some balance here because we clearly see its unfair and it ranges from congressman being shadow band, we are trying to find a free market, especially with the Mainstream Media being 85 liberal. We see that push. But we are the content and social media which gives us an edge. We would suggest though that some of the argument by twitter, they are saying that some of these comments violate standards. If we open it up to lawsuits for libel, wouldnt that make it even more difficult to have speech . Wouldnt more people be banned
and more people be suspended . No. If you are a platform for all ideas, you are not a part professional. On the
A look at the latest news and headlines of the day features discussions of politics and culture, analysis of Political Correctness in Campus Craziness and. The internet. Lets give people access lets give people rights and if we cant get that, lets make sure we know we defined facebook, youtube and twitter as publishers who are libel, as our fox news or the Wall Street Journal or anybody else for the content they put out. Tammy again, weve got to find a way to push back and one of the strengths we have here is that we are the content, there is a sense also that we are willingth to put up with anythig because our lives now are so intertwined with twitter, with facebook, social media in general. Its the new modern way to communicate and my concern, of course, is that we dont want them to go away and yet ironically they are private public companies, they are not p government. They can do what they please, but i think the power as an example, this conversation, being able to have a Point Of
knows exactly what s going on because since we are the contact we can at least push back. thank you so much for joining me today. appreciate it. great job. with got to find some way to be able to push back. the perfect person to speak with about this tonight. a civil rights attorney, she represents james to moore, who was fired by google for his personal views. she joins us now. welcome aboard. thanks, tammy, happy to be here. tammy: what you think of nigel s proposal about holdingol social media accountable as publishers to where they would be liable on issues like defamation, et cetera? i feel that that would be even more chilling because they are not the government obviously. they are not compelled by the first amendment to not act or to protectt our rights. what s your take on how conservatives can protect themselves and push back in this regard? actually agree with my show. sorry, tammy.
view and everyone knows exactly what s going on because we are the content and we can at least push back and make a difference. nigel, thank you so much for joining me tonight, i appreciate it. great job. we have to be able to find some way to push back. she s a civil rights attorney and represents james to moore who was hired by google for his personal views. what do you think of nigel s proposal about holding social media accountable as publishers to where they would be liable on issues like defamation, et cetera? i feel that would be even more chilling because they are not the government obviously and they are not compelled by the first amendment to not act or to protect our rights. what s your take on how conservatives can push back on this regard? i agree with nigel, sorry,