In an attempt to appear “inclusive” of the LGBTQ+ cult, American corporations are partnering with organizations that promote transgender ideology to children. One of these transgender-pushing [.]
that point earlier. if a speeding ticket constitutes a rap sheet, i guess we all have one. the notion of a rap sheet is the commission of serious crime, which that nominee, nor this nominee, has any problem with. i hope that we re careful in our wording before the committee today and fair in our questioning and give her a chance, finally, to respond. senator josh hawley wants to focus on her record when it comes to issuing sentences for defendants in child pornography cases. this is what he said about that. if you look at her record, what you see is this is someone who has consistently let sex predators, child sex predators off the hook, for people who have been convicted of child pornography offenses. she s given them lenient sentences, slaps on the wrist. what is he doing there as you see it. i can seltell you he isn t listening to his critics, cnn news, abc news, washington
he reaches beyond the room, the less he s trying to move votes in the room. and she was able to respond with the facts. she was able to respond with what she actually did and why. but i want to ask you, joyce, about the value of being for lack of a better word, real. of a nominee, not just showing intellectual prowess, disposition, command of the law all important, but humanity. it to play what judge jackson said about accusations that she s soft on sex predators. as a mother, these cases involving sex crimes against children are harrowing, but i think it s important to understand is that trial judges who have to deal with these cases are presented with the evidence. or descriptions, graphic descriptions. these are the cases that wake
0 stems back decades and that is concerning. you wrote your note on the harvard law review on sex crimes. your note is your major academic work on the law review and yours is entitled prevention versus punishment: towards a principled distinction in the restraint of released sex offenders. and in it you argue, and i quote, a recent spate of legislation purports to regulate released sex offenders by requiring them to register with local law enforcement officials, notify community members of their presence, undergo dna testing and submit to civil commitment for an indefinite term. at many courts and commentators herald these laws as valid regulatory measures, others reject them as punitive enactments that violate the rights of individuals who have already been sanctioned for their crimes. under existing doctrine the constitutionality of sex offender statutes depends upon their characterization as essentially preventative rather than punitive. and what you go on to explain is if they