Hearing were not able to come today, but to have a motion to continue this item to the call of the chair . Supervisor weiner okay. There is a motion and without any objection that motion passes [gavel] mdm. Clerk anything else be one no further business. So, meeting adjourned. [gavel] [adjournment] good afternoon. Welcome to the Planning Commission regular hearing for thursday, july 7, 2016, id like to remind the members of the audience that the commission does not tolerate disruptions of any kind. Proceedings. And when speaking before the commission, if you care to, do state your name for the record. Id like to call roll at this time. Commissioner Vice President richards commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner moore and commissioner wu we expect commissioner president fong to be absent and commissioner johnson to arrive shortly commissioners commissioners, the first item on your agenda is proposed for continuance harrison street a large project authorization at the time
Harrison street a large project authorization at the time of issuance was proposed jill july 14th but now staff is requesting it be continued to august 11, 2016, a notification issue that needs to be renoticed i know your calendars are impacted on august 4th and 11 have a couple of more continuances to consider that request to august 11th and further under your reading for the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency informational presentation theyre requesting a one week continuance to july 14th items 14 ab for cases at the fulsome street large project authorization and conditional use authorization is requesting a continuance to august 4th under the discretionary review item 15 for case at the jackson street discretionary review both parties the project sponsor and the dr requesters are in agreement to continue this matter i believe theyre on the vertical of an agreement in a withdrawal today well continue to october 13th. Okay i have no further items proposed for continuance an
Those two zip codes. Right. That we had all of the comparative data from. Where are the rest from . Tenderloin. A large percentage of clients come from the tenderloin so i would say tenderloin, the two zip codes you saw, the western edition and bay view Hunters Point so thats where we draw the client base from typically. I would say after the two listed is the tenderloin. A lot of the clients live in the sros in the tenderloin. So 94102 isnt the tenderloin . It is the tenderloin so the mission because were in the mission so the mission which i didnt list that one. Sorry. I thought thats of was mission. Mission district and the western edition and nine two one 04. Thanks. We do feel pretty lucky to get the building there. There are big fancy condos going up around us. Commissioner sanchez i too congratulate you and your colleagues and providing an exceptional service. I guess i was thinking too about how soma has changed in many ways, yet in many ways it hasnt changed because you still
Planning department so the department of Public Healths recommendation would stand and you would be informed of our recommendation and finding. For those consistent and recommended for incentives however we would present the items to you for public review and your final determination at a public hearing and the same for applications and if the department considers it inconsistent and deem its that way we would have a public hearing and you would make the determination. Thats an overview of the process. Now i will get into healthright360s specific application. Healthright360 is proposing to relocate two of its sites. The current site on mission to a new site at mission and van ness. It is two and three blocks away respectfully from the sites theyre relocate to the new site and expected to open in june of 2016 and will have 50,000 square feet. 30,000 is medical services. 10,000 is social services and 10,000 will be administration. Healthright360 has long been a partner of the department
Last slide consistent and eligible for incentives means incentives in the planning process so in the entitlement process managed by the Planning Department and we have a representative here should you have any questions about incentives or the planning process. So the review process is as follows. Applicant submit an application so healthright360 submitted to us an application for consistency determination. The Planning Department they submit to the Planning Department staff. Planning looks at it and makes sure they meet the requirements for the project. Do they meet the size threshold . Are they changing medical use . If they do they forward that application to the Health Department and the third step in the process is the Health Department reviews the application and the accompanying justification to determine whether it is or isnt consistent with the master plan. When we brought the master plan to you for your review and endorsement you asked us to deal with the three different type