What concerns me the way it sounds like what pushed in that direction was comments and the millions of often autogenerated, very short and not particularly or in anyway, rigorous comments from many, many commenters who said you know this is terrible, you need to go to title 2. He points to what changed, what he learned in the interim, its that four million, he says, commenters said we want title 2 and so did the president. But i think, at least from my per spektsive as a prak tigs to space, the key issue for chairman wheeler would be whether he explains it well enough in the dock et when hes faced with an apel lat court thats reviewing that. It kind of gets me to my earlier point that this rulemaking itself is not in a vacuum. Its actually a remanned essentially, from the verizon case, which itself was a reaction to the comcast case before that. Ed. So its not without a fwraet deal of prior work that hes operating. I think thats an interpretation. Not everyone is in agreement that the
Rigorous comments from many, many commenters who said you know this is terrible, you need to go to title 2. He points to what changed, what he learned in the interim, its that four million, he says, commenters said we want title 2 and so did the president. But i think, at least from my per spektsive as a prak tigs to space, the key issue for chairman wheeler would be whether he explains it well enough in the dock et when hes faced with an apel lat court thats reviewing that. It kind of gets me to my earlier point that this rulemaking itself is not in a vacuum. Its actually a remanned essentially, from the verizon case, which itself was a reaction to the comcast case before that. Ed. So its not without a fwraet deal of prior work that hes operating. I think thats an interpretation. Not everyone is in agreement that the court invited the commission to classify for the sole purpose of getting together to regulate a noncommon carrier as a carrier under title 2. And we can debate it endless
Millions of often autogenerated, very short and not particularly or in anyway, rigorous comments from many, many commenters who said you know this is terrible, you need to go to title 2. He points to what changed, what he learned in the interim, its that four million, he says, commenters said we want title 2 and so did the president. But i think, at least from my per spektsive as a prak tigs to space, the key issue for chairman wheeler would be whether he explains it well enough in the dock et when hes faced with an apel lat court thats reviewing that. It kind of gets me to my earlier point that this rulemaking itself is not in a vacuum. Its actually a remanned essentially, from the verizon case, which itself was a reaction to the comcast case before that. Ed. So its not without a fwraet deal of prior work that hes operating. I think thats an interpretation. Not everyone is in agreement that the court invited the commission to classify for the sole purpose of getting together to regula
Growing office parks in the world. Reporter but a city councilman says its a challenge. Giving up the cost of housing and displacing a lot of people who have been living here and created an enormous traffic problem. Reporter the city has already warned them not to submit ideas on how to solve chronic transportation and housing problems. We are trying to work with google and the other companies to allow some growth yet provide more housing in the North Bayshore area and build some permanent transportation improvements so well all enjoy the benefits of this growth. Reporter no one from google or linkedin was available to talk to us today. But you can be sure starting tomorrow there will be as Massive Public Relations Campaign mounted by them and others as they try to get their ideas across and sell them to the city council. Growing is good handled the correct way. Well see how it works out. Lenny, thank you for that. Palo alto is facing a tech boom. But next month it will take up proposa
[inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] welcome. Thank you for coming. Todays briefing is about the Internet Committee titled Circuit Court decision on fcc open internet roles is it random or is it a law. Such short notice the decision came on tuesday. Weve been awaiting it and wanted to do a briefing as close to the decision as possible. This is the congressional internet caucus advisory committee. We take no position on legislation or regulation but the proposition that the internet is extremely important and that we should try to insure a sound Decision Making so what we try to do in these meetings is any issue that affects the internet, we try to have a balanced perspective. A lot of perspectives on the issue and have a collegial issue on the topic. The socalled Net Neutrality rules lend itself to that type of debate. Hosted in conjunction with the congressional internet caucus and its cochairs, congressman bob goodlat