360 days to complete the work. I dont know what happened in between that time. But then when they came back in 2019 as you heard the option is a renewal permit which is appealable which is why we have an appeal. The extensions on the permits, this permit would have extended for a number of years. We just dont they have to write a letter to say why they start the work. So that didnt happen. That would have even they would have probably had an opportunity to do any appeals had they taken advantage of the Building Permit extensions. So here we are with a renewal permit under appeal. And as i said earlier the work if for the soft story and retrofit which is mandatory in San Francisco if you are on the soft story list. So they are i believe on the list. And as you heard the gentleman speak, there was a deadline of september 15 the department issued quite a number of notices of violation to buildings that hadnt applied and those mainly are buildings that havent filed a permit so they are in
Ranging from headaches and discomfort and sleeping to the most severe which is of course glioblastoma and brain tumors. As a cancer survive or myself, my son is a cancer survivor and my friend is battling glioblastoma and her doctors have advised her it was a result of wireless routers and cell phone towers in her neighborhood. Im asking the question about why were still having this conversation because with this evidence at lower levels, our population is at risk for serious modifications in their d. N. A. And the answer is because of a very outdated, unjust Telecommunications Act in 1996 that says that we as a population cannot resist the roll out of these highlevel small cell towers based on selfconcerns. I cant imagine a reason more important than our health to do so and the burden of proof should not fall on us to say its dangerous when the Telecommunications Companies were before the Senate Hearings and were asked how much money they had spent in determining the safety of these h
I attest and affirm the following statements are true, accurate and within my personal knowledge. In october 22, 2019 email to thomas, Health Officer San Francisco department of Public Health. One great solution is to set a maximum effective radiated power limit from the face of the antenna shroud at 40mili watts by adding the article to article 25. For Wireless Telecommunications facility that is installed in the public rightsofway or attached to any building or antennas installed at heights lower than 100 feet off the ground, the applicant must install only antennas radios and other supporting equipment that have no chance of exceeding the total of 40 milliwatts of effective radiated power from all the equipment operating at or connected to the specific wtf Wireless Telecommunications facility. 40 watts provides four main benefits. It provides coverage for Telecommunication Service for about onehalf mile from the source antenna. Two, does not effectively prohibit Telecommunication Se
Will remind you that in addition to considering the project the inkind agreement regardless of whether or not it gets approved or otherwise needs to be continued. And we would propose december 12. Ill accept the motion for the inkind agreement going to december 12. We can handle that with other you dont have to take that up separately. We can combine that with the project. Theres no other speakers here. I just wanted to be sure to what pushed me over the edge on this one was the prioritizing of the spanish emerging childcare. I witnessed two speakers up here with translators speaking as employees in favor of this project. I also heard some of the opposition saying that this group was displaced. So that kind of put me over the edge on this one. Commissioner fung. Starting perhaps with the things that are in my mind a little easier, there were a few points brought up regarding the design, regarding conforming to codes and i didnt see anything in there in looking at that reflects a challe
And so, theyre able to space them out very far. I mean bart is the same way. When were running short, twocar trains we have to deliver the same number of people. So right now, were running about 42 were scheduling 42 trains an hour and thats a signal of muni to run as many trains to fit into the tunnel. What this graph is showing is that were falling short of that because the tunnel is not able to handle the volume of trains that were scheduling for it. And so we need to provide upgrades to the tunnel in order to increase the capacity of the tunnel. As a comparison, cities like boston are running 15 trains an hour through their most congested corridors and were running 32. So were about double some of the other larger cities with major metro systems. And the result of that is that we run fewer, longer trains, which is something that were looking into. And that is one prong of the strategy and the other prong is increasing the number of trains that we can run in the subway, so looking a