Idea knew her so wanted to ask this commission a way to honor her maybe adjourning in her enemy or Something Like that thank you. Next yes. I dont know if you wanted to answer that marie youll a be hearing about the dignity fund i think some of you remember that sandy came to talk about the process of looking to put something on the ballot in november more discussion with the Mayors Office of housing and the supervisors the legislation will have an important parole for the commission to play id like to work with acting director mucking fanned to brief the commission so you understand the legislation and can have answers to the questions like commissioner ow powdered he posed with the fund will it replace money or on top of so the way it is structured it will provide a baseline of funding and the fund will will on top of that maybe we can figure out the best way to share information with the commission. Commissioner ow. Did you no comment. I just have one announcement and i think we can
Vendors. They also tend to have the process by implementing a consolidated Monthly Billing process, quoting the documents just like oca had with office depot. I want you to remember that this type of billing that by quicker and the lower administrative costs also allowed office depot to over charge the city by more than a Million Dollars a year for the five years of that contract. At the end of that contract, the Controllers Office with the contract, and it required additional controls to be in place and subsequent Office Supply contracts. None of those controls are written into this contract. Finally, i would like to point out the alternative that sfmta has rejected when they chose to get this contract. They reject the idea of accomplishing these objectives and improvements in house because it would require, and i quote, a significant investment in technology and training i submit that investing in the Technology Infrastructure and employee monthly base would have Better Benefits to t
Point out that the first year rent of 257,400 for the first floor, is an increase of 134,827 or 110 percent, that is compared to the current of 122,523 on the second floor where it is now. This increase is due to a 47 percent increase in the rent per square foot as shown in table two and that is on page 74 of our report. And based on fair market value and an increase of 33,320 square feet that is a 43 increase in square footage. On page 75, of our report, we state that while dhr is showing that the increased floor space would allow more testing capacity, dhr does not have specific information on, current delays and testing and Service Eligibility lists due to insufficient space on the second floor or have test and generation of Civil Service list will be increased due to the increase space on the third floor. In fact, we request of the department and we were very desirous of recommending approval of this item and we requested the department to provide us with the documentation which we
Whether prop j will be triggered in this case and i would like to be able to verify some of the assertions that have been made by the local 21 that the vendor process, if it is true, that to me does not, it is kind of circumventing what the laws are and we have the sweat free ordinance and there are vendors that are in front of other vendors and purchased the projects from the manufacturers that dont comply. And but i think that we should be avoiding as much as possible. I know that it is at a greater expense but we are also investing in making sure that this is responsible and so i would feel more comfortable to keep it here in the committee and i wish that we, we are looking forward to a break and i wish that we did not have that long of a wait between to get responses. So, quick question to the mta, i share these concerns, and i am very cognoscente of timing though. If we dont send this forward today, we are going to be looking at mid september . Could you talk about what impacts wo
Easton is really important to me as well. And so i am not prepared to forward this today as well. Given the number of questions that i still have as well. Okay. Thank you, supervisor mar. And again from my perspective, i agree with all of the concerns, i am sensitive too, i have too many comments from constituents all of the time about the buses breaking down and it happens on a routine basis and it effects us in the papers and all over the city and i would rather see us try to get this resolved in six days. Just a question on the prop j, is that something that if we were to move to the full board, whether that would be enough time to kind of determine whether that should be triggered or not . To the chair, to the committee members, it really depends on the complexity and the type of work that is being proposed. This generally two ways to contract for services, and one is through the prop j process when it is clear that City Employees have been performing a certain work and is being pr