N our panel. [applaus [applause]. A reminder if you missed any of this conference you can watch it online in the video library. Tonight on cspan2, we have been featuring booktv beginning at 8. Tonight, authors featured on after word will be with us. Tonight, beginning at 8 p. M. Eastern here on cspan2. Yesterday, marked 30 years of gavel to gavel senate floor coverage on cspan2. Our special program featured video from the senate floor going back to the first televised session. Here is a look the senate is trying to make the best use of the technology in the 21st century to remain true. It is difficult to forge compromise. Everybody has to give and that is not photogenic. This indeed is a humbling moment for me. I am honored to serve as majority leader. But i recognize the majority is slim. We have witnessed something that never happened before in senate history. The change of power during a session of congress. Watch that entire program looking back at Televised Senate saturday at 8 p.
Coming up on cspan3, u. S. Cyber commander Admiral Mike Rogers testifies before the Senate Armed Services committee. Then defense secretary Ashton Carter talks about changes to the dod command structure. After that, Supreme Court oral argument in betterman versus montana regarding the right to a speedy trial. Later a look at the fur of ture nasas Space Exploration program. Next, u. S. Cyber commander Admiral Mike Rogers dismisses the notion that america can combat isis propaganda on the internet by shutting it down. Admiral rogers testified before the Senate Armed Services committee on the nations Cyber Security infrastructure. This is just over two hours. Good morning. The Committee Meets today to receive testimony from Admiral Mike Rogers, commander of u. S. Cyber command, director of the National Security agency and chief of the Central Security service. A lot of titles, admiral. Thats good. Thank you for your many years of distinguished service and for appearing before this committ
For them thats not a way to reduce the gap but the market rate and parking we analyzed this was appropriate their within the Design Guidelines that has a maximum of one parking space per unit and this is well below that thats less than 10 percent will have access to the parking so its within our guidelines. So i understand maybe the financial explanation but im talking about a public convenience prospective that i mean folks that live and everyone has use for parking spots and transportation. I guess am i missing something theres more personal conveniences being afforded to the market rate side of thing through the chair. Commissioner, i think part of the issue theres a share of costs between the market rate developer and the affordable later developer if i reduce all the parking to reduce the percentage the the affordable has to cover from the reduction in the a m i mike why dont you add to that as elizabeth mention we have a set of controls that specify the maximum of one parking spa
Theres more personal conveniences being afforded to the market rate side of thing through the chair. Commissioner, i think part of the issue theres a share of costs between the market rate developer and the affordable later developer if i reduce all the parking to reduce the percentage the the affordable has to cover from the reduction in the a m i mike why dont you add to that as elizabeth mention we have a set of controls that specify the maximum of one parking space per unit. This project is you can by far the lowest the market rate projects of the all projects like thirty percent i know parked for the market rate project. So, i mean the simplest answer theyre expecting the market rate to rely on bike parking and things like that. For a market rate project like this you have fairly expensive units there are some may or may not benefits to having Parking Spaces so when we discovered the affordable project needs a break the market rate developer sort of built those Parking Spaces that
Have done it by focusing on three areas. We expect services and smarter and faster ways. For example, when a Natural Disaster struck, teams from fema had to rely on inspections to figure out which families needed help. Now they analyze imagery and get images that are needed most were quickly. Most folks were able to sign up using the mobile and web apps, checking the status of helping with Internet Access to sign up for Disaster Relief without leaving their homes. Making sure that we are delivering Services Better and faster and more efficiently. We have identified more than 2. 5 billions of dollars across the federal government and that is just the beginning. I have signed into law dozens of federal programs and have cut even more that were duplicate or not working no longer needed the basic principle is tax payers deserve the biggest bang for their buck, especially at a time when budgets are tight and we have to do more with less. Anyone can visit whitehouse. Gov to see the taxpayers