For them thats not a way to reduce the gap but the market rate and parking we analyzed this was appropriate their within the Design Guidelines that has a maximum of one parking space per unit and this is well below that thats less than 10 percent will have access to the parking so its within our guidelines. So i understand maybe the financial explanation but im talking about a public convenience prospective that i mean folks that live and everyone has use for parking spots and transportation. I guess am i missing something theres more personal conveniences being afforded to the market rate side of thing through the chair. Commissioner, i think part of the issue theres a share of costs between the market rate developer and the affordable later developer if i reduce all the parking to reduce the percentage the the affordable has to cover from the reduction in the a m i mike why dont you add to that as elizabeth mention we have a set of controls that specify the maximum of one parking spa
Change the resolution. Sorry commissioner mondejar i have a few questions into two groups the certificate of preference are informing those displaced. Yes. Displaces like the one development they received the members of the how old are to receive a certificate of preference. Theres a lot of certificates of preference still preference and dr. Espanola jackson said its ending in 2016. If you look at package 8 of the certificate of Preference Program which is the attachment to the o to the mou it states that the certificates there are a variety of types but residential a or c certificates are valid until seven years after the completion of the project area like 2016 because i cant remember which project expired in 2005 but if this expires in 2008, im sorry. So basically that allows the Agency Commission to approve 5 year extensions to that project area no extensions. No extensions because nothing has expired yet. What happened if theres not used and expires and thats it. If no extensions
Days or within 60 delays e days like a project completion report and an annual report as theyre happening i dont want to wait until the end of the year and figure out what went right or wrong. Ongoing. I prefer more regularly reporting. I like that idea but instead of 45 days whats reasonable so we have two projects a month mabel need not be reasonable i want to reasonable number. We can look at that and see whether its 60 days or, you know, confer with most of the staff. The blank days of the completion and maybe an annual report which might be the same report given to us annually. Is this helpful and f 3 doesnt change the resolution. Sorry commissioner mondejar i have a few questions into two groups the certificate of preference are informing those displaced. Yes. Displaces like the one development they received the members of the how old are to receive a certificate of preference. Theres a lot of certificates of preference still preference and dr. Espanola jackson said its ending in
Obligations and see what the language says it didnt allow us to do what our suggesting its specific to c h s and its an incentive to changes to the c h s tendency but not allow for the subject e subsequent land use over the space but specific to the c h s land use lease so through the dissolution less than we were required to content to the change and also given the fact in the past under the lda which is the enforceable obligation theres a connection between the money referring to the first obligation so we justify that but if we did anything in in addition its a like a new exertion of authority. If we dont content what happens. If we dont content happens great question commissioner ellington. What happens is nothing c h s right now, were in this period because of dissolution we were in limbo for several years and taken a while to get to the agreement to get the money for their operations and continue with their its in their budget to continue with their program and the remaining spac
Resale at this point that limited Equality Program unit is theyre to monitor and see the affordability issues arrest the affordability. At the end of the day, we have to sort of wind down over time and cant be here forest sadly to be monitoring all the inclusionary units. But the degree were involved in before their turned over so those agreement are those modified with the Mayors Office of housing what is our say. Once the asset is transferred theyll have the ability to amend the document like maybe our enforceable obligation requirements they couldnt do something in conflict but were transferring the asset to missouri cd and our programs are consistent in how we deal with the inclusionary market rate unit so it might, you know, you know sally i can help you got it. Before i lose my train of thought. Thank you for that the other piece it the minority contracting piece. I wanted to follow up i think commissioner singh raised that. So this pipeline this is a public document; right . Rig