Research on the web on them and i know that in nevada, where they are based, the Nevada Transportation Authority had the problem with the systems just in terms of privacy issues and i understand in new york they are running a test on 150 cabs and so my concern becomes, when we look at a 6 Million Dollar contract on an untested vendor, would it be more prudent to say that we do a pilot of 150 to 200 cabs to see if he can deliver the goods . It has one of the largest taxis fleet and they have a fleet and, a limo fleet and a settle operation at the airport. And the technology that they have developed was over the years, some, the things that they developed in the house and seeing the utility of it for their own fleet, they decided to start this transportation infrastructure company. And this is not their first product. I believe that their first product was an advertising platform that was qualified by veriphone. And they have a cashiering system that is a Software System that has been in
Forth. So holistically we need to devise a blueprint so that those who have been impacted that justice is done. Thank you very much. Any other Public Comments . I thought we had some any other public . No other Public Comments. All right. We will take note of the communications, is that correct . Item 5 . Correct. Commissioner moran. Mr. President , a couple of items under communication, f and g are basically the water supply report. I have reviewed those and had some conversations with staff. I think there is a couple of areas where the reports are incomplete. And other areas because of that incompleteness they are misleading. I would like to ask those reports be revised and reissued in january to correct those issues. Items f and g, thats the order without objection. And the other thing as we talk about Regional Water supply, i mentioned before that, we have our own plans of how we develop that supply, and boska has their own. Another thing i would like to see in january is a discuss
Ymca. Chuck collins our present ceo has written a letter in support of this. We are looking forward to this new park. My experience in working with the families in the neighborhoods, chinatown doesnt have a lot of open space. This is whats needed and i thank you for bringing all the children to this brand new park. Thank you. Thank you very much. Are there any other members of the public who wish to speak on item no. 2 . Seeing none. Public comment is closed. Colleagues, i want to thank you for sitting through this item and as all the Public Comment and as has been mentioned this is a project thats been talked about for decades, six plus years and through my office with a lot of work and the parks and Recreation Department and puc. I appreciate your hearing involvement from all the community and a lot of people have taken a lot of pride on whats happened and excited for the future. I want to thank you for your support and specifically margo kelly from my office. We would not be here to
To pay for solar electric systems and solar Water Systems over the life of those systems and thats an impediment and right now the vehicle for that is Third Party Ownership and Investors Group and wallstreet owns the systems on peoples homes and only addresses the solar electric system and not how we reduce the natural gas usage, how we reduce hour water usage and how we decarbonize our transportation and those three issues are actually major issues with respect to Climate Change and how we respond to that, so we have a huge opportunity to respond to Climate Change and by engaging a local work force to do that work and skill people up. We have many Old Buildings in San Francisco. Many Old Buildings that would benefit from the upgrade of those buildings to be more efficient so people can spend their money other than on their utility bills. Right now the barrier to that is being able to pay for that. Paying for that over the lifetime of the system so that you can pay it with the savings
Happened after october 24th, 2013, and in 10 years. Right. So evictions before october 24th wouldnt trigger it a thats good to im glad well have a good two weeks continuance to get clarification on that. And where did the october 24th date come from thats the Planning Commission recommended those edition it would create a window for landlord to rush through an evocation in the meeting time when it was flooded and next day. Then in terms of what kinds of evocation that are covered by this. Didnt i saw there may have been some changes it refers to the code section unless you have the code handy can you tell me news it we borrowed it from the code conversion law. There were a couple of changes thats in the financial version what was added was covering evictions for lead abatement and substantial rehabilitation for if the original tenant isnt offered the chance to reoccupy the unit and the third one in the occupant is sold within the comedy conversion but if there, there is a condo convers