Participate in the meeting through Video Conference to the same extent as if they are physically present. Public comment will be available on each item on this agenda, sfgov. Org is streaming the number across the board. The opportunity to speak during Public Comment period is available via phone call by calling 4156550001. Meeting id 146 4585942 and press pound twice. When connected you will hear the meeting discussions, but you will be muted. Dial star 3 to be added to the speaker line. The best practice is to call from a quiet location, speak clearly and slowly and turn down your television or radio. Alternatively, you can email myself the budget appropriations clerk at linda. Wong sfgov. Org. To submit Public Comment via email it will be forwarded to the board of supervisors and be included as part of the official file. Items are expected to appear on july 21st, and spanish and chinese interpretation are available for those who need Translation Services during Public Comment period
It will not attract a larger area around the field. They say theyre requesting usage so its not to restrict feud planned or change use of this field. It leave open for all sorts of use in the future. Disrupting our family time and we havent even have kinner together so please i am hoping ha we will not approve this permit. You have 40 questions remaining. Good evening, honourable commissioners, my name is Molly Mcfadden and im an alum new as well as an allumni representative for the class of 2014. And im a resident of the sunset district and has been my life of 24 years. And im calling in support many of which were hinder. They have completed the field after practise and locking away our this was inconvenient and scary as a young woman who stands at 53 and 115 pounds walk to go my car in the dark. Our students and coached walked me to my car. If you approval this project, all students and Staff Members as well as our neighbours can feel safe walking own to their vehicles and. You are 4
First its always the hardest and when they look back they really wont see you, but its the path that youre paving forward for the next one behind you that counts. Hi, my name is jajaida durden and im the acting superintendent for the bureau of forestry and i work for public works operations. And im over the landscaping, the shop and also the arborist crew. And some tree inspectors as well. I have been with the city and county of San Francisco for 17 years. And i was a cement mason, that was my first job. When i got here i thought that it was too easy. So i said one day ill be a supervisor. And when i run this place it will be ran different. And i i didnt think that it wod happen as fast as it did, but it did. And i came in 2002 and became a supervisor in 2006. And six months later i became the permanent supervisor over the shop. With all of those responsibilities and the staff youre also dealing with different attitudes and you have to take off one hat and put on another hat and put on
Finding no material differences between this case and whole womans health. On burdens it found that axis 620 would lead louisiana with just one clinic and one doctor providing abortions. At the same time it found that axis 20 when do nothing for Womens Health. In reversing the District Courts decision the fifth circuit committed to fundamental errors. First, it usurped the role of the District Court and disregarded nearly all of its factual findings. Second, the fifth circuit accepted legal arguments that this court rejected four years ago. Nothing however has changed that would justify such a legal aboutface. In fact, even more medical organizations have joined the ana to say that admitting privileges imposed barriers to abortion with no benefit to patients and at this impact is not state dependent. Finally, the states 11th hour objection to thirdparty standings runs up against still more binding precedent. The court squarely held in [inaudible] that such objections are waivable and t
Now, the oral argument from march 4 of this year. Your argument this morning case 181323 juno medical Services First russo in the competition 181460 russo versus medical services. Mr. Chief justice and matt please the court that this case is about respect for the courts precedents. Four years ago the court held in whole Womans Health that the texas admitting privileges law imposed an undue burden on women seeking abortion. The louisiana law at issue here acts 620 is identified to the texas law and was expressly modeled on it. After a trial the District Court ruled it unconstitutional finding no material differences between this case and whole Womans Health. On burdens it found that axis 620 would lead louisiana with just one clinic and one doctor providing abortions. At the same time it found that axis 20 when do nothing for Womens Health. In reversing the District Courts decision the fifth circuit committed to fundamental errors. First, it usurped the role of the District Court and di