the difference is i think the difference, though, is that if she s running, she will be asked to weigh in on all the policy debates that a serious candidate is going to have to. if you re running for office in the state you have to weigh in on how you would vote on the immigration bill. you will have to weigh in on serious debates. the challenge would be whether she is talking and speaking out as a commentator, reality tv host, gets her own cooking show or runs for president, the kinds of questions she d have to field would be intertwined with the serious policy debates if she were running. if she is running her own cooking show and being asked about what s going on in the middle east, versus being a candidate for the united states senate and being asked. if she s running her own cooking show and comments on that, yeah, i could see that bleed out to other campaigns. but that s what i m saying. if she s running for office, she would be asked more serious questions. that s her
that s quite a list. here to talk about it are my guests. i just have to say, i mean when she goes down that list, it s pretty effective. she did endorse a lot of winners. jamal? yeah. but she is a political reality tv star. she is not actually i think a relevant person to the process. jay-z and beyonce go out and endorse candidates and do events. that doesn t make them people you necessarily want to have lead the country or participate in serious policy debates. i think she was nowhere before sarah palin came in and endorsed her. she is still a relevant force and having this pac i think will determine the next two years whether she can stay there. this is the first step. we re hitting the part of the cycle where her influence is probably as big as it s going to bement we re going into a mid-term election. these tend to be low turnout elections. this is all about getting out your base. that is what sarah palin excels