kinds of political stunt and it is a disservice to the americans people what a hideouers miscarriage of justice, a majority power exercisingnc influence over house committee assignments. wow. e asand right on cue, squad mems tried to shout outrage at one another with their faux outrage, cries louder. wow. a striking vocal similarity. the white supremacy happeningbli is unbelievable. thisng is just a bunch of racisth gaslighting. we all know it.t gas they turn congress into a placec of fear mongering, hate general . time is required that our country is failing you today. to this chamber is no longer. my voice will get louder and stronger and my leadership will be celebrated around the world as it haer ands been o utterly dissinger us and yet so predictable. the party that presided over the weaponization of government agencies from the fbi to the a suddenly crying foul. and why?why? because their committee position was actually put to ade vote . how darey they be heldn accounta
end.t includ and it must include defundingded thesine agencies that are out od control and cutting across the board, cutting spending 10%k a year like every american t family, like every business hasl already had to do. absolutely.ri ght, right. w how do y gentlemen, thank you. great to see you.that now, how dato you know thatwith companies that virtue signalusio with diversity, equity, inclusion know it knows a scam? well, they re the first employees, the dea employees pai sent packing. bloomberg reporting that the layoffs sweeping the tech industryla are gutting dii departments listings for dci roles were down 19% last year.se a bigger decline than legal or general human resources jobs saw, according to findings from textile. now here to make sense of why,mn this is as horace cooper project 21 chair and author of you all back in chains.t that horace. now, i t isn t just that these departments are useless. they are actually dragginge these companies down, are they not? ? well, that s
there was damage other than just offending some legalistic congressman who contends that the president lied to me. when you prove damage when you prove damage to this great country, when you prove that we ve lost some freedom, when you prove that part of our country s been taken over, has been given to a foreign power, when you prove some damage, then you ve got a case. but there s no damage that s here that can be proven. now, see, if it were foreign influence, if it were some foreign power being invited in, well, then even earl landgrebe would concede you ve got a case. even that guys. i ll tell you the postscript on earl landgrebe is that he was walloped in his re-election in 1974, sent packing. he was replaced by a democrat who happened to be a history professor from the local university. impeachments take wild turns, and we think we know what s going to happen. we think we know how they will
congressman who contends that the president lied to me. when you prove damage to this great country. when you prove that we ve lost some freedom. when you prove that part of our country has been taken over, has been given to a foreign power. when you prove some damage, then you ve got a case. but there s no damage here that can be proven. now, see, if it were foreign influence, if it were some foreign power being invited in, well then even earl landgrebe could see you ve got a case. even that guy. i ll tell you the post script on earl landgrebe he was walloped in his re-election effort in 1974, sent packing. he was replaced by a democrat who happened to be a history professor from the local university. impeachments take wild turns, and we think we know what s going to happen. we think we know how they will proceed, but do not get too cocky. i mean, here s what we think is
so even if he is guilty of obstruction of justice you do not think he should be removed? absolutely not. not until somebody proves there s damage other than just offending some legalistic congressman who contends that the president lied to me. when you prove damage to this great country. when you prove that we ve lost some freedom. when you prove that part of our country has been taken over, has been given to a foreign power. when you prove some damage, then you ve got a case. but there s no damage here that can be proven. now, see, if it were foreign influence, if it were some foreign power being invited in, well then even earl landgrebe would concede that you ve got a case. i mean, even that guy. i ll tell you the post script on earl landgrebe he was walloped in his re-election effort in 1974, sent packing. he was replaced by a democrat who happened to be a history professor from the local university.