(The Center Square) â Five Michigan House GOP members sent Attorney General Dana Nessel a
letter threatening to file articles of impeachment against her if she prosecutes anyone profiting from spreading lies about the 2020 presidential election.
The irony is that a Senate GOP
report âfound no evidence of widespread or systematic fraud in Michiganâs prosecution of the 2020 electionâ and even asked Nessel to investigate Michiganders making âmisleading and false information about Antrim County to raise money or publicity for their own ends.â
For example, a crowdfunding
website claims attorney Matthew DePerno, who has led the charge in Antrim County, has raised $384,000 of a $1 million goal for an âElection Fraud Defense Fund.â
Renk Int Patrick Colbeck s Response To MI Senate 2020 Election wbckfm.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from wbckfm.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
By oracknows on April 28, 2015.
I ve written on multiple occasions of what I like to refer to as antivaccine dog whistles. In politics, the term dog whistle refers to things politicians can say to certain groups, usually groups with odious views, that they are with them without actually echoing the views for which the group at which the dog whistle is aimed. The intended target audience gets the message, while those not familiar with the issues either don t get the message or see what is being said as something unobjectionable, even admirable. Think states rights versus civil rights, for example.
It turns out that antivaccinationists have their own dog whistles. Used most prominently recently by the antivaccine pediatrician Dr. Bob Sears and by candidate for the Republican Presidential nomination Rand Paul, antivaccine dog whistles generally involve appeals to health freedom, the freedom not to be injected with medicines, and, of course, parents rig
FROM: Patrick Colbeck
On April 2, 2021, lawyers from Clare Locke LLP issued a letter to me on behalf of US Dominion, Inc that made spurious claims and threatened legal action in response to my efforts to expose election fraud in the 2020 election. The letter referenced a previous letter which they had submitted of which I was not aware until I searched through unread email dating back to December.
In the April letter, the lawyers acting on behalf of Dominion demand that I “retract my false claims and set the record straight”. They claim that the notarized affidavits cited in my presentation “Case for MI Decertification” are “unreliable sources” despite being subject to perjury charges if proven false. In support of their claims, they cite blatantly biased, unnotarized sources such as the MI Secretary of State and Scytl which are not subject to perjury charges if proven false. The fact remains that the vast preponderance of their claims against me actually refer to cl