Answered my question. You have even my response. It is recognizing this country, there are a number of risks we face. It is a large country. Part of the conversation we have to have is with the department of Homeland Security and the administration, lawmakers, the american public, we cannot mitigate every threat. It is understanding those that will have the most significant consequences and ensuring we have a conversation about how we go about mitigating them, that we have the resources, personnel, to go about doing that. Having the conversation that we have today and over the course of time are, i think, what is critical. You have already taken steps by moving away from sequestration. That will be helpful to us as well. I think recognizing we have to that we have to manage risk and that we cannot prevent every incident, and as long as we are adapting ashen general . Protective federal services is unique that we have both state,ugh local, federal, and civilian environments. We do that
But they are so careful about not mingling interests of what got you here today was the talk about immigration. I thought about getting all of you together, but you have slightly different takes. You are a member of the group of eight. Maybe it is not a group of 7. 5, depending how senator menendez is doing. We will see. In the question of how the white house even today, the president said at the Democratic House retreat that he is heartened by democrats and republicans both seem to take this seriously. Politics may not be easy. There are regional variations in the country. There is youth and dynamism. I love you in your group of eight role. Also sharing your work with the colorado compact. Talk about the Michael Bennett vision of what we need to do to achieve Immigration Reform. If i can, let me take you to colorado on this issue. That is where my interest started first, as a School Superintendent in Denver Public schools. The lack of resolution for young people who have come to this
Own new program which will air 6 00 p. M. Weekdays. Well announce the start date eventually. But you can mark your calendar in a rough way if you want. A big breaking news night. So im happy to hear what Rachel Maddow has in store for us. Youre giving us a calendar alert that could exist in the age of digital calendars. Youre telling us to pencil this in in general but i cant give you a start date. Write a macro so at some point that stakicks in and it starts. Thats all i was allowed to say. A very Laurie Approawyerly a tonight i had an a block all set and ready to go. We worked on it this weekend. All this Breaking News Stuff this evening and then this happened this evening and we had all of this crazy stuff happening with the legal teams that are trying to defend or
senator rand paul from kentucky said he wouldnt vote for it because Repealing Obamacare was still too much like obamacare. Whatever. For whatever reasons the two of them said they wouldnt vote it. So we were heading into
Manafort faces. The judge told them to get back to work though. So could it mean we are any closer to a verdict. But we start with some Breaking News. An nbc news exclusive. Former trump personal Attorney Michael Cohen is discussing a plea deal with federal prosecutors. One that could come as early as this afternoon. Thats according to sources familiar with the matter who spoke with nbc news. Tom winter is the nbc news investigations reporter who helped break the story. Our guest is a former u. S. District attorney for the Southern District of new york which is conducting the cohen investigation. Let me begin with you, tom, lay this out. What else did the sources say . How close the possibility of seeing some kind of deal emerge today . Sure. So ayman, as ellie can probably well tell you, no prosecutor counts their chickens and counts a plea deal until they have it. Then insigned. And the person is in court. I think were still a little a ways away from that, based upon
Coverage of nati
The highly respected president s and in the case of canada, the Prime Minister are satisfied with the deal. Its good for canada and good for mexico. Good for all three. This is good for all three. Just that fact makes it good for us. This is good for all three. This is a much different deal than nafta. Much more of a reciprocal deal for the United States. Go ahead, peter. We will do the kavanaugh questions. You talk about being treated harshly. We will do that in a lets finish up trade. You have a lot of people who want to run over to the Wall Street Journal and start writing. I cant hear you. A mexican journalist . You are going to keep the tariffs on mexico for steel . Until such time where we can do something that will be different like quotas, perhaps. So that our industry is protected. We are not going to allow our Steel Industry to disappear. It was almost gone. If our country kept going the way it was going, within two years we wouldnt have a Steel Industry. We have to have stee