[ applause ] next, i would like to thank chief charlie beck of the Los Angeles Police department who saw something in me and promoted me to the rank of commander and deputy chief. You gave me a great opportunity to develop, to provide support and you provided a role model in me and provided me as a leader. I would like to thank you for the support and opportunity that you provided me over the years. I would not also be here if it werent for you to give me an opportunity to start in the Los Angeles Police department. I hope i can do you proud. [ applause ] next, i would like to thank retired chief Gary Peterson of ralph and associates to conduct and search for police. While i tried the do my job with the Los Angeles Police department. I was fully engaged when gary contacted me and talked to me about this great opportunity. As any great recruiter does he was persistent and he made me realize of this opportunity. He didnt have to do much convincing about me coming to live in the city of S
Building do think the june 16 version with those other versions go meet use of materials breaking it up etc. , can actually work . As context because width no. I dont think subject i believe the challenges the department choses and the discussions i had denied informal off the record discussions just about architecture with some other people in the Department Just deal with on detail and emphasis which is less than emphatic than what we see you. It does not have to be as aggressive or loud of building as it is. There are good parts about it when you put them into a large of a quantity they become overbearing. He. One last question. Because we have two commissioners that were at the june 1626 it is her building in the city that reminds you of the building i could reference because look at this on these little a. 5 x 11 is hard for me. I really dont like the september version. Is everything we dont want it to be. There is one building, if the building of similar scale. We have no buildin
Building do think the june 16 version with those other versions go meet use of materials breaking it up etc. , can actually work . As context because width no. I dont think subject i believe the challenges the department choses and the discussions i had denied informal off the record discussions just about architecture with some other people in the Department Just deal with on detail and emphasis which is less than emphatic than what we see you. It does not have to be as aggressive or loud of building as it is. There are good parts about it when you put them into a large of a quantity they become overbearing. He. One last question. Because we have two commissioners that were at the june 1626 it is her building in the city that reminds you of the building i could reference because look at this on these little a. 5 x 11 is hard for me. I really dont like the september version. Is everything we dont want it to be. There is one building, if the building of similar scale. We have no buildin
Building do think the june 16 version with those other versions go meet use of materials breaking it up etc. , can actually work . As context because width no. I dont think subject i believe the challenges the department choses and the discussions i had denied informal off the record discussions just about architecture with some other people in the Department Just deal with on detail and emphasis which is less than emphatic than what we see you. It does not have to be as aggressive or loud of building as it is. There are good parts about it when you put them into a large of a quantity they become overbearing. He. One last question. Because we have two commissioners that were at the june 1626 it is her building in the city that reminds you of the building i could reference because look at this on these little a. 5 x 11 is hard for me. I really dont like the september version. Is everything we dont want it to be. There is one building, if the building of similar scale. We have no buildin
Building do think the june 16 version with those other versions go meet use of materials breaking it up etc. , can actually work . As context because width no. I dont think subject i believe the challenges the department choses and the discussions i had denied informal off the record discussions just about architecture with some other people in the Department Just deal with on detail and emphasis which is less than emphatic than what we see you. It does not have to be as aggressive or loud of building as it is. There are good parts about it when you put them into a large of a quantity they become overbearing. He. One last question. Because we have two commissioners that were at the june 1626 it is her building in the city that reminds you of the building i could reference because look at this on these little a. 5 x 11 is hard for me. I really dont like the september version. Is everything we dont want it to be. There is one building, if the building of similar scale. We have no buildin