there are still a lot of unanswered questions. i don t want to get to a head of the facts. i think we have to lead barr and durham do their job but i think the attorney general barr is going to give us a much broader view of all of the spy tactics that might have the trump campaign whereas horowitz and to the ig are limited to what went on in the justice department. there is a natural evolution but it barr i think would be the most comprehensive and final say of what is right and wrong in this investigation. as usual, great reporting from the get-go. also, we are tracking breaking news stories including a shocking deponent about hillary clinton s elusive server. accordingly, her secret server filled with top secrets might ve been hacked by china but high ranking fbi officials didn t care one bit.
i think it is a disgrace that we can t get hillary clinton s 33,000 e-mails. hillary clinton put her e-mails on a secret server. hillary s illegal secret e-mail server. illegal secret server. where is the server? i want to know where is the serv server. it is so farfetched, so ridiculous. i think it rekiidiculous what i going on with the probe. it is a disgraceful situation. it is a disgrace. frankly a real disgrace. it was a disgrace to the fbi. it was a disgrace to our country. phony witch hunt. witch hunt. witch hunt. it is a hoax. total witch hunt. russian collusion. give me a break. there is no collusion. zero. there was no collusion. zero collusion. then i learn ts puts me at greater risk for heart attack or stroke. can one medicine help treat both blood sugar
presidency here. the fact of the matter is we know american names are being unmasked. we know that somehow general flynn s conversation, the transcript of which was leaked, again, another incident of confidential information that was being put out. i think at a certain it s either got to put forward the evidence and say here s what s going on the only thing i have to say to that jason, is when wikileaks was leaking things about anthony weiner, when they were leaking things about hillary clinton, john podesta s e-mails, all i heard was lock her up. i haven t heard one democrat say lock him up. i ve heard democrats say investigate, but well, but there s a big difference. i didn t hear anyone on you know, on the other side saying enough with the hillary clinton investigation. well, the difference, i mean hillary clinton had an illegal, secret server. nobody said it was illegal. oh, her secret server? her secret server was definitely illegal. it wasn t illegal. don, c
unmasked, somehow general flynn s conversation, transcript leaked, confidential information put out. at certain point have to put out evidence only thing i have to say, wikileaks leaking about wiener, clinton, podesta, all i heard was lock her up. hnt haven t heard one democrat say lock him up. i hear investigate. i didn t hear anyone on the other side saying enough with the hillary clinton investigation. the difference, she had illegal secret server. nobody said it was illegal. her secret server was definitely illegal. it wasn t illegal. don, can i just jump in here? shouldn t have had it, bad
hacking or 99% certainty that foreign intelligence agencies got into hillary s e-mail server. that didn t bother anybody either. what is your reaction to the hypocrisy? you re laughing. i have a whole new theory. here s my new theory, that they re right, the kgb did it even though they ve been gone for 20 years, the kgb came and convinced hillary to set up a stupid secret server, they then convinced hillary to eliminate 33,000 e-mails and to lie about the rest. it s hillary s fault, it s a secret act that undermined her ability to do anything koch t t competent. how do these people live with this stuff? there is dero, understand, since before the election zero new evidence, not one bit, not