Acknowledging a very different trails. They are the most powerful forces fighting for our attention. The approach of work without Political Violence its technology that say is Fueling Misinformation and polarizing content for clicks and profit. A safer, free speech sprekting more enjoyable social media is possible. This morning, were going look at how the Technology Companies built platforms connecting the world that are now challenging the very foundations of democracy. Conditioning congress is concerned about what big content we see. You used this power to run amok. You have used it to silence conservatives. We do have National Security concerns from the fbis end about tiktok. Democratic senator of minnesota and republican congressman Mike Gallagher of wisconsin will discuss what congress can do to regulate social media. Joining me for insight and analysis are New York Times Technology Reporter cecilia kang, carlos carbello, former Homeland Security jay johnson and Elizabeth Knoll la
the twice impeached disgraced ex-president to overturn his election defeat. it s a glaring and unavoidable fact that mike pence one of the key stories of january 6th and the person that the entire plotry lied on doing what trump wanted him to do. he never testified about what happened to him or what made his whole family and the secret service detail run or what happened to the country for that matter under oath. today we have news of a potential break through on that front specifically. a federal judge ordered mike pence to testify before the federal grand jury under oath. that grand jury is investigating the january 6th insurrection and donald trump s efforts to overturn the 2020 election. judge boseberg rejected donald trump s and mike pence s efforts to block a subpoena. trump s lawyers asked the judge s predecessor to limit pence s testimony claiming certain issues were off limits because of executive privilege that protects communications between the president and some
acknowledging a very different trails. they are the most powerful forces fighting for our attention. the approach of work without political violence it s technology that say is fueling misinformation and polarizing content for clicks and profit. a safer, free speech sprekting more enjoyable social media is possible. this morning, we re going look at how the technology companies built platforms connecting the world that are now challenging the very foundations of democracy. conditioning congress is concerned about what big content we see. you used this power to run amok. you have used it to silence conservatives. we do have national security concerns from the fbi s end about tiktok. democratic senator of minnesota and republican congressman mike gallagher of wisconsin will discuss what congress can do to regulate social media. joining me for insight and analysis are new york times technology reporter cecilia kang, carlos carbello, former homeland securi
alicia: i m in for arthel neville. we are watching at the president is visiting the middle east. this with inflation and gas prices sky high here at home. eric: more on the southern border, leaked data shows that more than 160,000 accompanied this children this year shattering the record from last year. alicia: fox live team cover with bill melugin but first alexandria hoff. incentivizing them to report the whereabouts about conservative and supreme court justices in realtime. the left-wing group shut down dc and venmo use confirmed $50 for sighting. this includes but not limited to calls to target people with abuse or harassment online and behavior that urges offline action such as physical harassment. twitter has not responded to fox news inquiry as to why the tweet is still up the bounty offering after man was charged to showing up kavanaugh s home and kavanaugh was forced to escape back steakhouse after protest learned whereabouts. poor guy, he left before sufle, to b
uvalde copy cat attacks. how cool. but wait there s more. america s old foe, disinformation. this information is popping up to an extent it could fuel further violence. wait, there s more. as campaigns are gearing up for the midterms, the dhs expects calls for violence by domestic extremists to not only continue but actually to increase. but wait, because there s still more. it s not all about elections. and no the dhs also does warn to look out for the fall out from potential supreme court decisions. that must shock you. the roe v wade discussion. it should surprise no one there will be a visceral reaction to the final ruling. the reaction could not just be visceral but violent. the agency is actually flagged both abortion rights supporters and opponents. for advocating violence. and the summary says is that the primary threat of mass casualty violence in the united states stems from lone offenders and small groups motivated by ideology believes and or personal grievances. p