Of very important impact these portable housing and childcare and open space is all very important, but again, once again, transit impact fees are basically left off the table. As a reminder the transit Impact Development the most likely will not apply. To this project. Because it is accommodation of residential and Nonprofit Development which of the two major exceptions to which you can drive one or more mack trucks. So, it is frustrating that this keeps happening. We feel like im a little bit done kyoto don quixote tilting at windmills, but this is real. Writing more population. We just had a hearing yesterday in the Landuse Committee about the fact the we are expanding population, expanding Housing Development along all these areas where we are struggling to meet even current demands. Sadly that hearing not even single press attention. Nothing. Its like it is complete deafening silence about this looming issue. Ill be supporting this project but i want to give fair warning, that at
Quixote tilting at windmills, but this is real. Writing more population. We just had a hearing yesterday in the Landuse Committee about the fact the we are expanding population, expanding Housing Development along all these areas where we are struggling to meet even current demands. Sadly that hearing not even single press attention. Nothing. Its like it is complete deafening silence about this looming issue. Ill be supporting this project but i want to give fair warning, that at some point we need to draw the line. Projects cannot just keep moving through that are not paying impact fees to support critical transit capacity expansion that we need along market street, along the southeast waterfront. A number of different areas of our city. Thank you. I will be supporting the project. When he can divorce years ago by was over 600 feet and the issue came up and do a lot of concerns, but i think as much as i would like to see the project scaled down a little bit more i think the fact that
We are not there, i will be supporting the supervisor and her motion. I think i was a little bit optimistic and i do hope that maybe some day we can resolve the issues around the Mexican Museum. Thank you, president chiu. Supervisor campos . Thank you mr. President. Again, i want to thank all the parties that have been working on this project. Its also good to see former supervisor ma her in the building. I too have been hopeful and optimistic in seeing if it was possible for the parties here to come to an understanding that would address the concerns that have been raised around shadows and still allow the project to move forward. I know that discussions have been had, im not sure exactly how different people would characterize where the discussions are at this point. I dont know if its as close as maybe some of us hope it would be, but in any event, we are where we are and i think its unfortunate that we have not been able to resolve those issues and we mayen up having to resolve the
Even though the key idea does not currently reach certain types of development, we routinely, as part of negotiation, for development whether its Development Agreement or other kinds of entitlements, we negotiate impact fees that are not automatically triggered absent negotiation. For example, we do a superb job negotiating increased inclusionary fees for Affordable Housing well beyond what our inclusionary Housing Ordinance requires. Thats terrific. Thats because someone has been negotiating it. Is being prioritized by the people who are negotiating the agreement until it happens. The same can happen with transit impact fees. Weve seen that with some projects. Just as a matter of making sure were minding the store when it comes to the Transit System and seems at times we are not. Any additional discussion . Madam clerk with stable on item 66 [roll call] there are 11 eyes. This ordinance is passed on the First Reading. [applause] colleagues, when we go back to our second 3 pm special o
Seeing if it was possible for the parties here to come to an understanding that would address the concerns that have been raised around shadows and still allow the project to move forward. I know that discussions have been had, im not sure exactly how different people would characterize where the discussions are at this point. I dont know if its as close as maybe some of us hope it would be, but in any event, we are where we are and i think its unfortunate that we have not been able to resolve those issues and we mayen up having to resolve these issues through litigation and a ballot measure. Thats i think a very unfortunate thing. I dont know at this point that thats avoidable. That said. I want to say just make a couple of points that go beyond the substance of this hearing even though i think its very important here to that we look at these issues carefully and i will support the motion by the District Supervisor and i appreciate the work that all parties have done to get to this po