If we gave mammograms to every 22yearold woman in america, we wouldnt save any money. We would spend a lot money on mammograms and 0. 2 of 22yearold american women have Breast Cancer. We would have a lot of false positives as well. Just because you deploy a test doesnt mean you save money. We all have to die of something. Yes, you can extend life. Just because we live longer doesnt mean health care suddenly becomes cheaper. If you look at the countries with the longest life tha expectancy, they spend the most on health care. It is heavily arguable as to whether prevention saves money. A lot on theexpect fiscal side. We should do it because its better medicine. I would endorse that. Many years ago, kaiser did a study of screening. That didnt pay off. The argument for prevention, very good premiums. Every good insurer knows that. If you had targeted Breast Cancer for people and their history it could save money. Overall, i totally agree. Everything ive read suggests that to accept people
bild.de - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from bild.de Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Отпадна карантината за пристигащите от България в Англия и Шотландия - Общество
novini.bg - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from novini.bg Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.