Minutes for the april 16th regular meeting. Thank you. Directors are there any changes to the april 16th minutes . Okay. Seeing none, well open the item for Public Comment. Are there any comments . Comments on the minutes. Seeing none, well close Public Comment. Is there a motion please. And a second on the minutes. So moved. Moved move. Approval rather. Yes. Second, thank you. Please call the roll on the motion to approve the minutes. Director henderson a henderson i director kinsey i kinsey i director so i so i director tarloff i director kahina i kahina i chair ekin ekin i thank you. The minutes are approved places you on item five communications. I have none moving on to item number six introduction of new or Unfinished Business by Board Members. Board members, are there any items of new or Unfinished Business today . Director. So. Hi, everyone, i want to take this moment to, say that we are celebrating the Asian American Pacific Islander heritage month. This is a month of may. And
Money if this is something that not only increases the value of the property but its work that would have been done anyway. And then its work thats already been done, and these are the kinds of things that i think that should be coming to the board prior to the completion of the work and so i guess im just not interested in going backwards here. So i just want the department to help us to understand why were at this point after the fact. Good question, i love this committee. Good afternoon, or good morning, Committee Members and supervisors. Tim frey, department staff. This is something that i think that the city has some flexibility in determining what is considered or defined as recently completed work. The recently completed work definition in the Mills Act Program does state that it can be work thats happened within the last two years. And thats something that the city attorneys office, along with the full commission and board decided was a reasonable time frame but based on what i
Camera project, its a subgrant from the Union Square Business improvement district. We have seven locations with cameras and maps so theyre on golden gate and leavenworth and up by our new office on allison wheels, at the corner of ellis and leavenworth has cameras. We just received an oewd grant for the last go around for cameras so well put up somewhere between two and four more locations, depending how much we can leverage out of the Property Owners to put the cameras up. But these cameras have been very effective and we work closely with the San Francisco police department, theyre in our office quite often to get the tape to use in the prosecutions. Our biggest budget item always has been and probably will be is cleaning our sidewalks. You have seen this before, basically sweeping great feety and removing and pickup of the needles and we continue to do that in this fiscal year and were successful at that. And thats it. Im open to questions, thoughts, comments, on any of our work or
I dont remember that one. Supervisor kim mr. Frey. My ris recollection is only e waller Street Project is the only one with a 10year limitation. Supervisor kim okay. And that was actually a significant reduction, at 59 in terms of their property assessed value. Okay. These two projects are slightly lower in their reduction rate. For me on a level of consistency i would move both of those items forward with the 10year limit and that would be my recommendation to have the Property Owners come back again to explain additional costs or rehabilitation at that time. So that will be the amendment that i will be making on these two on these two items. So before we take a motion to do that, were going to open up these two items for Public Comment . Any members of the public that would like to speak on items 4 and 5 . PackagPublic Comment is now clo. Colleagues on item 4 and 5, can we take a motion to move those forward with recommendation, amending it with a 10year term for the mills act exempt
Supervisor kim thank you, mr. Frey. If maybe the Committee Members can remind me of the three that we forwarded with recommendation to the full board, 101 , and 940 grove and 637 waller, did we limit all three of those to a tenure mill is act . Supervisor breed i dont think that we did all three, the 940 grove i pushed for no limit, and i cant recall exactly i think that waller was a limit and what was the other one . I dont remember that one. Supervisor kim mr. Frey. My ris recollection is only e waller Street Project is the only one with a 10year limitation. Supervisor kim okay. And that was actually a significant reduction, at 59 in terms of their property assessed value. Okay. These two projects are slightly lower in their reduction rate. For me on a level of consistency i would move both of those items forward with the 10year limit and that would be my recommendation to have the Property Owners come back again to explain additional costs or rehabilitation at that time. So that wil