Property programs for the upkeep of building so that they be in good shape. And what do i tell the 925,000 that goes to really and almost all cases small districts in what they are doing without money. You take care of 12 federal buildings instead of giving them the 925000. Were trying to get rid of these to be clear. To be clear easier at the payments and federal Property Program and moved it to the Facilities Management program. That is typically what you did. The goal is to eventually move properties to local districts. Local districts dont want them today. The other argument to the 67 million you might not agree with that, but the districts lost the Property Tax Base their because of federal activities. Those are one that have resulted in a lot of kids going to school for the Property Tax Bases reduce. Wouldve supported the billion dollars for the Impact Aid Program in the areas where they are having an impact on the student involvement. But what we understand as most of the school
Questions. Most are not aware of this and have not received training dollars to be aware of it. We met the enemy, and it is us. So yes, and we invest in professional development. We would like to invest more. And i also argue publicly in many places that the money we put behind current teacher professional development, not future teachers is often well sorry. Is often poorly spent and not spent on things teachers are looking for. It seems reasonable that congress would give some direction, if we see a need to address 20 of the population, that we could give specific direction it shouldnt be like here some money. Spends it as you wish. But we have a specific national need. Please address. Much like concord and hiv are going to the moon. There are many children with special needs, many children facing real challenges, and for me its not about picking out this population, that population. Its about how to get every single one of those children i accept that. In times of limited resources,
That is not department of education, its other departments and the government. This is a widely recognized problem that we have, that weve all contributed to including us in congress, those of us who have been in government. So heres my question, would you be willing an example, let me give an example for example when students withdraw from college a portion of their title 4 funds has to be returned to the federal government. Regulatory techs are figuring out what that is, over 200 pages in a handbook. Thats one of the number one objections they have. That could be easily fixed with financial responsibility standards, theres a requirement for audited Financial Statements for private nonprove it and for profit colleges that causes them to get expensive letters of credit according to this report. These requirements by the department dont cause dont follow accepted accounting principles, another one is that when the fapsa, the application for federal grant or loan which is 108 questions i
That is not department of education, its other departments and the government. This is a widely recognized problem that we have, that weve all contributed to including us in congress, those of us who have been in government. So heres my question, would you be willing an example, let me give an example for example when students withdraw from college a portion of their title 4 funds has to be returned to the federal government. Regulatory techs are figuring out what that is, over 200 pages in a handbook. Thats one of the number one objections they have. That could be easily fixed with financial responsibility standards, theres a requirement for audited Financial Statements for private nonprove it and for profit colleges that causes them to get expensive letters of credit according to this report. These requirements by the department dont cause dont follow accepted accounting principles, another one is that when the fapsa, the application for federal grant or loan which is 108 questions i