okay. threaten with high fines, which they don t pay me as much per year as they threaten to fine me, so it is definitely not in my own best interest to divulge anything to anyone because i could not afford it, i do not want to go to jail. this honorable south carolina state employee, obviously, accustomed to dealing with crazy people also repeatedly makes it clear in she s simply doing her job in responding to his inquiries about the application process and there is no guarantee he and his fictitious associates will receive any medicare assistance. like i said, i m not promising. does the hospital not have some type of charity program that could potentially help?
nearby hospital that were shot in belfast. his group, project veritas says it proves yet another example of widespread medicaid fraud. given that shaun murphy tells the state of south carolina he is a terrorist, needs health care for foreign citizens, and expresses incredible wealth, what would the medicare office do? how many do you need? there s 25 of them. that should be approximately 25 applications. you are welcome to take copies if you need more. the disability report, these don t have to be signed, so it is definitely not in my own best interest to divulge anything to anyone, because i could not afford it. i do not want to go to jail.
is. the system will be squeezed, but it is so bloated. 60% more allows for a lot of pressure that doesn t necessarily touch patients until you get well below until you re getting down to levels constituents seem to spend. we disagree how easy it is to cut medicare. i sat in a room in 1983 with finance committee staff and we pulled out $3 $200 billion in medicare cuts. that included tax increases and deficit reduction accomplished through medicare cuts, and in doing it, i have to tell you, dave, it was a very painful and difficult thing to do. it was all taken out of the provider side. the other thing about it politically is, it was done without a peep. there was not a single liberal objection anywhere in the senate or in the house when bill clinton came in and did a very serious deficit reduction
package as his first act as president and went straight at medicare, but at the same time, went at the tax code and it wasn t this 3 to 1 ratio, it was a 1 to 1. they raised as much revenue as they cut in spending. democrats have done this before, they know how to do it, but nothing like the scale the president, i think, was pretending to do with republicans. presidents are what they say, not what they think. and this was the opportunity, certainly, a place republicans could have leaned harder on the president to see how sincere he was. your point about the providers in 1993, very powerful. we do not know if there are efficiencies there. in government, you have limited tools, pull the lever, hope something good comes out the other end, often it s preverse, but given how much spending there is, that s how sam walton made money, he squeezed
finance committee staff and we pulled out $3 $200 billion in medicare cuts. that included tax increases and deficit reduction accomplished through medicare cuts, and in doing it, i have to tell you, dave, it was a very painful and difficult thing to do. it was all taken out of the provider side. the other thing about it politically is, it was done without a peep. there was not a single liberal objection anywhere in the senate or in the house when bill clinton came in and did a very serious deficit reduction package as his first act as president and went straight at medicare, but at the same time, went at the tax code and it wasn t this 3 to 1 ratio, it was a 1 to 1. they raised as much revenue as they cut in spending. democrats have done this before, they know how to do it, but nothing like the scale the president, i think, was pretending to do with