what they think. chuck rosenberg, what is you take there is a lot in the indictment that did no surprise me, we have bee hearing for a long time it would be related to the hush money payments and therefore false entries on the books and records of the trump organization but there are some reall fascinating detail in th company statement of facts tha prosecutors filed yesterday, which shows, a couple of things one, their theory for elevatin those false records and thos false entries into felonies, violations of election law state and federal, and the hin of a plan to violate state - law. you also see the sensuality of not just michael cohen to this scheme, but also - clear to me from the statement of facts, and the prosecutor can prove everything in that statement of facts tha minister pecker woul essentially publishes th national enquirer wa responsible for the catch an kill stories, is a reall important witness. he had private conversations with trump, and in those convers
and save some of it is amounting to a partial confession it was last september in a different interview with sea hannity when donald trump said and declassified documents jus by thinking about them as former president of the united states, if he thought about them being declassifie the name fact would be declassified we should ask chuck rosenberg, as a former prosecutor himself if you re the special counsel, if you are jack smith what are you making of these interviews that donald trump is givin again? especially the ones to sea hannity. i was thinking, willie, about when i was a federal prosecutor, preparing fo trial. i would literally have a manil folder which i would label m cross-examination vile every time i found a documen or someone said something or something i thought it could b useful, i put it in that file. the file here would be enormous i mean, as prosecutors w collect stuff. we hold on to staff. we never know when we re going to need stuff. but mr., trump from