dnc did in collusion with hillary clinton. we re talking about a system that beat down a man who beat him down to the point that quite frankly bernie sanders now himself is a sellout. he had no shot. donald trump called him crazy bernie, if you ll remember that, so it is kind of funny that now donald trump is on bernie s side. she s crooked hillary. and she s crooked hillary. they should not have treated sanders or o malley the way that they did. a this was biased in their favor. that s different from saying they stole the election. he had a contract. they had a contract! austan, you have a tough job today, because there s no way to defend this. and as we said i m not defending that. i m not defending that. but you re working around the periphery here. the fact of the matter is, there s no way to even put a soft shoe on this. what they did was wrong. it s symptomatic of what the democrats do. it s also this goes into the russia story and fusion gps and
sense throughout the entire debate that she was less debating with sanders or o malley. and they see her as too hawkish. in other words, they were saying you re too aggressive on this front. so that gives you something of the democratic temperature, that they do not unlike the republican debate where they re talking about carpet bombing and killing families. here you see hillary clinton as the most aggressive among the democrats in terms of taking the fight to isis. matt, bernie sanders was saying to that effect, he kept saying she s so anxious for regime change and he really tried to pin her down on that. i saw a real similarity between the republican debate and the democratic debate. obviously the races are different. hillary clinton is by far the front runner. on the republican side, it s in flux. but what you have is a similar dynamic, where you have an establishment candidate who are much more hawkish, much more interested in regime change
sense throughout the entire debate that she was less debating with sanders or o malley. and they see her as too hawkish. in other words, they were saying you re too aggressive on this front. so that gives you something of the democratic temperature, that they do not unlike the republican debate where they re talking about carpet bombing and killing families. here you see hillary clinton as the most aggressive among the democrats in terms of taking the fight to isis. matt, bernie sanders was saying to that effect, he kept saying she s so anxious for regime change and he really tried to pin her down on that. i saw a real similarity between the republican debate and the democratic debate. obviously the races are different. hillary clinton is by far the front runner. on the republican side, it s in flux. but what you have is a similar dynamic, where you have an establishment candidate who are much more hawkish, much more interested in regime change
sense throughout the entire debate that she was less debating with sanders or o malley. and they see her as too hawkish. in other words, they were saying you re too aggressive on this front. so that gives you something of the democratic temperature, that they do not unlike the republican debate where they re talking about carpet bombing and killing families. here you see hillary clinton as the most aggressive among the democrats in terms of taking the fight to isis. matt, bernie sanders was saying to that effect, he kept saying she s so anxious for regime change and he really tried to pin her down on that. i saw a real similarity between the republican debate and the democratic debate. obviously the races are different. hillary clinton is by far the front runner. on the republican side, it s in flux. but what you have is a similar dynamic, where you have an establishment candidate who are much more hawkish, much more
categories of people who would be allowed to stay in this country legally. clinton didn t do exactly that, but she did say she would make some changes to potentially make it easier for people who are here and are undocumented to stay, josé. let s go over that. it is it does go quite a bit further than mrs. clinton has said her immigration plan, i m talking about sanders. among other things, he would say everyone here for five years or more would be allowed to stay. there is another interesting issue. there is a five-year pathway to citizenship. looking at things look even the senate bipartisan bill that passed some years ago, that wasn t in there. it goes further than that. susan, is this something that sanders or o malley, who is also pro immigration reform is this something that could get any traction with the democrats? there would be parts of the democratic party who like this idea, but frankly it s not