Lure a young man into killing for her. To be seductive to, get him to kill her. I never would have done it if pam didnt tell me to. She was the first girl i ever loved. I pulled the trigger. God forgive me. Your trial defined media frenzy. This was the first trial to be broadcast live from start to finish before o. J. , before the menendez brothers. It was reality tv before there was reality tv. I meet pam smart. Shes beautiful, shes intelligent, shes an adult, and she likes me. It gets made into a movie, to die for which stars phoenix and nicole kidman. A lot of people felt like they knew everything about me because they saw the movie. Why is it pamela smart served a life sentence with zero percent of parole . Nobody cared anything about me being a human being, a person with feelings, im nothing but that mistake. What do you think is your best hope for getting out . There is one thing pam smart could do today that could give her that chance to get out of jail, but she wont do it. Were
Adjourned. [ applause ] rnlgts this is not about the facts. We saw that yesterday. The facts are very clear. T the witness yesterday said unless there was an announcement of a investigation there is no call, no meeting, no money. And, of course, the ukrainians got the call, they got the meeting and the Security Assistance dollars and there never was an announcement of an investigation. So this is not about the facts. This is about, i think, what nancy pelosi said and the speaker of the house said sunday when she said she called president of the United States an imposter. Democrats never got over the fact that the new guy had never been in this town. This new guy came in this place and shaking this place up. And that drives him crazy. They never accepted the will of the americans. They never accepted that he won in a landslide and theyre trying to do everything they can that was first the fbi investigation and then the Mueller Investigation and now its this. Theyre trying to do everythi
Look, i think it is clear from the start that this is not about the facts. We saw that yesterday. The facts are very clear. With what ambassador sondland said, and less there was an announcement of investigation, there would be no call, no meeting, no money. And of course the ukrainians got the call, the meeting, and they got the is security the Security Assistance dollars and there never was an investigation. This is about what i think nancy pelosi said, the speaker of the house said funding. When she called the United States president an imposter. They never got over the fact that this new guy who has never been in politics got in here and is shaking this place up, that drives them crazy. They never accepted the will of 53 million americans, that he won an Electoral College landslide. Now they are trying to do everything they can to come as mr. Green, democratic representative green said, impeach him because they know he is going to win reelection. That is the unfortunate position th
Law professor. You have gone through this 45 page indictment now. What is your top line take away so far . Guest how much of it is very into with the january 6 committee careful work over many months. We saw the various Public Programs outlining the massive amount of evidence that the january 6 committee developed. Also, they had to report, of course. And we are seeing a Second Branch of government work in tandem with the United States congress to bring some accountability to the white house, frankly. I wrote a piece a while back in Politico Magazine shortly after january 6, in which i did a thought experiment with my students. We went through the various guardrails around the presidency, to make sure president s dont cross boundaries. Effectively, the only thing that was left was a criminal indictment. I see this as an important step in protecting how our democracy states accountable to the people. And too much power does not get out of hand in a way that could destroy the republic mo
Passed two years later. Sunday night at eight eastern on cspans q a, you can listen to all of our podcasts on our free cspan now. Host we are joined this morning by Kimberly Whaley a former u. S. District attorney and university of baltimore law professor. You have gone through this 45 page indictment, what is your top line take away so far . Guest how much of it is very in tune with the january 6 committee and their careful work over many months. We saw the various public tvs programs outlining the massive amounts of evidence that the january 6 committee developed and then also they had the report and we are seeing a Second Branch of government work in tandem with the United States congress to bring some accountability to the white house. I wrote a piece a while back in politico shortly after january 6 in which i did a thought experiment with my students, where we went through the various guardrails around the presidency to make sure president s do not cross boundaries. Effectively, t