Adjourned. [ applause ] rnlgts this is not about the facts. We saw that yesterday. The facts are very clear. T the witness yesterday said unless there was an announcement of a investigation there is no call, no meeting, no money. And, of course, the ukrainians got the call, they got the meeting and the Security Assistance dollars and there never was an announcement of an investigation. So this is not about the facts. This is about, i think, what nancy pelosi said and the speaker of the house said sunday when she said she called president of the United States an imposter. Democrats never got over the fact that the new guy had never been in this town. This new guy came in this place and shaking this place up. And that drives him crazy. They never accepted the will of the americans. They never accepted that he won in a landslide and theyre trying to do everything they can that was first the fbi investigation and then the Mueller Investigation and now its this. Theyre trying to do everything this he can to have mr. Green in an impeachment because they know hes going to win reelection. So thats the unfortunate position they put our country in. Of i thought dr. Hill said we got to quit this kind of stuff that is tearing our country apart. That is so true. What is happening is not good for our culture, not good for our nation. Yet the democrats do not care. They are bound and determined to do whatever it takes to get after this president and again, i think the American People see through it. The they see the facts are on the president s side and they know this process is entirely unfair. I dont know what is planned. We just have to wait and see. Well take some questions. [ inaudible question ] did she say it . Did she call him an imposter . How is that helpful to our country . How is that not tearing our country apart. He didnt call her imposter. She got elected speaker of the house. He is president of the United States. We dont have to establish any narrative. The facts are on our side. The facts are on the president s side. The truth sois on the president side. [ inaudible ] did you watch the hearing yesterday . I asked ambassador sondland when did it happen . Of course, he said when did what happen . The announcement that you said had to happen before they got the call, meeting and money . He said there was no announcement. That says it all. Right . That says it all. There was never remember when the call came out, they said its going to be a quid pro quo. Havent seen it. Not there. Testified they rejected very strongly a notion that ukraine may have meddled in the 2016 election. She said this is a fictional narrative and they propagate by the russian security. You are willing to accept her testimony . Look, we all no he that russia meddled in the election. Thats not to say that ukraine didnt try to influence the election. Those are the words we used all along with the member of parliament. He said the vast majority of ukrainian politicians want Hillary Clinton to win. And they took actions to help her win and the statements and thing thez did. Is that on the same level as what russia did . We never alleged that. Its not. It still happened. To dismiss it out of hand makes no sense. It is still happening. Actually helping russia by you know what she said today when i asked her. I said was the steel do theier a rabbit hole in the deposition . She said yes, christopher feel god played. That is the biggest example what you just brought up of how russians tried to impact the election because that document that he put together where he got played running down a rabbit hole, the fbi used it to spy on an american citizen. Why arent you concerned about that . That is the biggest that fact that happened in this country is so darn wrong. But it did and our fbi did it. When he they couldnt find anything, bob mueller spent 2 1 2 years doing the same thing. He didnt find anything here. Now they come to this . Thats what happened. Im giving you the answer i just gave you. [ inaudible question ] it doesnt exchange the facts. You cant have a we presume. This is i acase tha case that d happen. They spent four or five hours refuting the quid pro quo was based on guesses and presumptions and no facts. [ inaudible question ] that was his perception, thats correct. Despite all the work that weve done, the democrats are going toim pea impeach the pres do you view this as a failure . That was determined a week and a half ago. But i thought that the telling sign from that vote that day was two democrats voted with republicans. Every single republican understand whats this is for, how wrong this is and so did two democrats. We have to go. The House Intelligence Committee heard from nine witnesses. Today from russia analyst fiona hill and also david holmes, the political counsellor at the embassy in ukraine. Video outside the long Office Building across the street from the u. S. Capitol where todays hearings, all the hearings this week are held. The were going to take your phone kaldz acalls and reaction waiting for possible comments from democratic members of the committee and