written and this new york times op-ed as more evidence of what they suspect in an administration run amok. for those that love him, this is kind of what you voted for. someone that will operate outside the box.we can have arguments about whether or not that s appropriate in this context. taking a member of the presidents desk? some of that just call that staffing. [laughter] chris: you may get a call from mitch mcconnell. if it wasn t for that, there were controversies this week that the president send out a tweet i think on monday basically chastising the attorney general for the prosecution of two republican congressman, saying these guys are running. it s the midterm. these are safe seats. don t mess around with that. as one points out at the end of the week, on national security grounds, he thinks attorney general session should
those that hate president trump see what bob woodward had written and this new york times op-ed as more evidence of what they suspect in an administration run amok. for those that love him, this is kind of what you voted for. someone that will operate outside the box.we can have arguments about whether or not that s appropriate in this context. taking a member of the presidents desk? some of that just call that staffing. [laughter] chris: you may get a call from mitch mcconnell. if it wasn t for that, there were controversies this week that the president send out a tweet i think on monday basically chastising the attorney general for the prosecution of two republican congressman, saying these guys are running. it s the midterm. these are safe seats. don t mess around with that. as one points out at the end of the week, on national security
case that this is a prosecution and a special counsel run amok, gone far afield from the initial case their initial mandate to investigation collusion in the election. and they ll have something else to point to. the new york times is reporting that the manhattan district attorney s office is considering pursuing criminal charges against the trump organization and two senior company officials in connection with michael d. cohen s hush money payment to an adult film actress, according to two officials with knowledge of the matter. i think that s important because these state charges trump could not pardon people. i ve always thought this was really dangerous territory for trump trump, in some ways more dangerous than the russia investigation because of the women, the personal life, things people can relate to. the gender gap for the party is huge. i just think that the more attention that s focused on this, the more it causes trouble for president trump with women,
whether mueller has the authority to run this investigation. now, we did get a colorful statement from roger stone about his former associate. i ll read you part of it. he says that andrew miller is a good father, a devoted husband and a loyal friend. the efforts for squeeze him to bear false despicable. andrew miller has had a wide variety of job, but he s worked on and off for roger stone, as his driver, tech guy. so who knows what the special counsel might want from him. you say miller is actually challenging the legality of the mueller investigation. what is his case? well, the argument is essentially that mueller was improperly appointed, that you know he is sort of this super attorney run amok. this is what his lawyers are arguing. that he really doesn t have the authority to be overseeing this investigation. now, we ve heard a couple federal judges have heard arguments similar to this, they have not bought into it, they
amendments to restrain their own tyranny. they debated everything, right? not that. his notes say nin com, and unanimously they vote to put the second clause of article 5 that gives us the power. what they intended is the power to restrain a federal government run amok. that is the purpose of our efforts around article 5. call a convention, get the states together have, them propose amendments that will retrain federal tyranny. mark: isn t it true, dr. coburn, that this is what the states used to do? they used to meet, they used to have conventions, not constitutional conventions, conventions of the states, to resolve problems, to address issues, this is to practice, so to insert it in the constitution as mark meckler says is to counter the notion that only amendments can come from the federal congress, two-thirds of both houses and wasn t it mason who said what if congress is oppressive?