amendments to restrain their own tyranny. they debated everything, right? not that. his notes say nin com, and unanimously they vote to put the second clause of article 5 that gives us the power. what they intended is the power to restrain a federal government run amok. that is the purpose of our efforts around article 5. call a convention, get the states together have, them propose amendments that will retrain federal tyranny. mark: isn t it true, dr. coburn, that this is what the states used to do? they used to meet, they used to have conventions, not constitutional conventions, conventions of the states, to resolve problems, to address issues, this is to practice, so to insert it in the constitution as mark meckler says is to counter the notion that only amendments can come from the federal congress, two-thirds of both houses and wasn t it mason who said what if congress is oppressive?
own tyranny. they debated everything, right? not that. his notes say nin com, and unanimously they vote to put the second clause of article 5 that gives us the power. what they intended is the power to restrain a federal government run amok. that is the purpose of our efforts around article 5. call a convention, get the states together have, them propose amendments that will retrain federal tyranny. mark: isn t it true, dr. coburn, that this is what the states used to do? they used to meet, they used to have conventions, not constitutional conventions, conventions of the states, to resolve problems, to address issues, this is to practice, so to insert it in the constitution as mark meckler says is to counter the notion that only amendments can come from the federal congress, two-thirds of both houses and wasn t it mason who said what if congress is oppressive?