Hunter biden behind closed doors. And so now the huge irony is that as the process moves to the senate, when republicans are going to control the entire process, theyre saying even though our argument was that we were cheated and this is unfair in the house, now that we control it, we dont want witnesses and we dont want a trial. Unbelievable. Thank you so much, heidi. Let me go back to garrett on the floor. Whats happening now . That measure did not succeed . Reporter it wont succeed. Were waiting on a few more votes to be cast. Im watching a couple more tick off the board. We expect this will probably be the last of the procedural hurdles at this phase of the game. We expect the next thing to happen will be the debate on the actual rules setting the terms of debate for the Articles Of Impeachment. This will look like an actual debate when it gets started. You will see members start to hash out not just the Process Arguments that you heard from heidi, but also democrats will
be making
‘Voter’s intention deducted from ballot paper, not by any antecedent or subsequent expressions’, observed the Kerala High Court while rejecting the vote cast by a voter who was a candidate himself..
with x new language, whatever they decide to choose, and at that point, then, they could say, we d like to come back before you now that we ve addressed these things that you re okay with it, and at this point, we ll bring back in our client. he can have the opportunity to plead guilty again to a plea agreement that perhaps more satisfies the issues of the court and the procedures of court, known as rule 11. catherine, if you will, first time we re hearing from you today, weigh in on what has taken place so far today with the breakdown of this plea deal, now hunter biden pleading not guilty, and having to revisit an agreement between both parties. well, it was clear from the outset that hunter biden s attorneys and the prosecutors were on a completely different page about what this agreement meant. and that s very sloppy. and as a former prosecutor, i ll put this on the prosecutors that they would go to court and usually these hearings are smooth sailing. now the judge is not a pot
disclose witness testimony, it s one of their afraid of it, right? something in the transcript that doesn t serve jim jordan s interest, and dan goldman, our former colleague, also a former federal prosecutor, someone who knows how to read the law, reads into committee hearing, the rule, the rule 11, which says you ve got to make a record, and you ve got to make it available to every sitting member of congress. what are the consequences for jim jordan, right? dan goldman laying it out, saying, i m sorry, we re on the committee, it doesn t just go to some of you, but right now, it is, jim jordan is telling him to pounce off. it s the existential question of these times, right? what happens to people who won t follow the rule of law? are we still a rule of law country, or aren t we? this jim jordan getaway with these kinds of shenanigans? if you re sitting in congress, it looks like this, you are thinking about not pushing the rules to fire. when you are no longer the party in power,
advisers who s actively how are they supposed to feed their family? of course they re going to do whatever they can to feed their family. i don t fault them. it is unusual to have a testimonial transcript generated from that, and have the other side both not present and not give them a copy of what the testimony is. we just aired a one-two punch. first, we re learning one of these witnesses is getting paid by someone tied to donald trump. jim jordan s answer, they ve got to make money somewhere. that s a ridiculous category, a, and be, it s a fox news legal analyst saying it makes no sense. that s rare. i think they re exactly on point, right? you know, here s the situation where people don t want to disclose witness testimony, it s one of their afraid of it, right? something in the transcript that doesn t serve jim jordan s interest, and dan goldman, our former colleague, also a former federal prosecutor, someone who knows how to read the law, reads into committee hearing, t