dnc. the rnc has rule 11 an ironclad thing that says they can t get involve in primaries. if mccarthy is running they can t get involved unless the state of california republican party files a rule 11 letter at the clair declaring him the candidate. they can get rid of the rule especially if donald trump tells them do. they might do so and the candidates will be out of luck. the rules are there ain t no rules. we seen the kneel of donald trump i ll do whatever he wants so yeah. when you think about that and going forward and you mentioned the idea of you almost all of you are preschooliuming trump we the obvious nominee of the rnc. desantis, his ad reminiscent of the be a farmer notion, do you think he could actually over take him? i think the fact that
a financial driver. he taps into that to replenish those coffers. so it s a self-licking ice cream cone in a sense. but i don t think it necessarily puts a damper on it, but i think you can be very clever and dance this line, but at a certain point, you have to jump. you either want the protection or you want to control your purse. maria very smartly talked about rnc policy. one of the things that the rnc has is what s called rule 11. rule 11 is an ironclad thing that says they can t get involved in primaries even if kevin mccarthy is running for election. they can t get involved in his congressional primary unless the state of california republican party files a rule 11 letter declaring him the candidate. well, they can get rid of that rule whenever they want to, especially if donald trump tells them to. that s right. they may be likely to do so, in which case the other candidates are going to be out of luck. so the rules are there ain t no rules. that s the crux.
A Lawrence attorney should not have been subjected to Rule 11 sanctions based on his alleged assertion of frivolous claims in a state-court complaint later removed to federal court, a panel of the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled. The panel’s decision reverses an order by U.S. District Court Judge William G. Young
The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued a three-part ruling that affirmed the district court's denial of a motion to vacate as void the judgment based on Rooker-Feldman doctrine.