What units us voter is belief that the system is not on the level. Its rigged completely, completely against them and i think that when you realize that one of the number one indicators from an obama county to trump county the increase in Opioid Epidemic and you look at technological dislocation of jobs of artificial intelligence, i think that this will be the fault line that defines our politics and i think that the voters essentially hate both of these parties, they think they are a plague on the country and the one that they hate the most at any given hour is the one that they perceive to be in charge and so if you see a trump versus Elizabeth Warren, you will see legitimacy candidate for the presidency. I dont mean to filibuster. The democrats have become more urban and the republicans have become more rural and i think you have a totally disaffected suburban population in the country that isnt spoken to by by either party. Christian. Yes, so i agree with some of that and i think t
Panel, enlighten, provocative and its great harmer was its stability. At time when there are no civil discussions are very few going on for people with radically different views, a lot of respect so far. Im sure that will continue. One announcement by the way, so what on the last panel said thee president had met with the entire city to explain a strategy on north korea. I just got a little message. He met for 14 minutes with the entire senate he met for 14 minutes. So i dont know what that says about the last panel. Our final panel is on the future of the parties. And let me introduce people briefly. On my far left, no indication of ideology, Steve Schmidt come closer and privacy with the chief savages for the 2008 john mccain in 2004 george w. Bush president ial campaign and youve all seen him commenting rather wisely and about 2016 and beyond. Christian grose, a colleague, social professor of Political Science at usc, author of the awardwinning Book Congress in black and white, race
Panel, enlighten, provocative and its great harmer was its stability. At time when there are no civil discussions are very few going on for people with radically different views, a lot of respect so far. Im sure that will continue. One announcement by the way, so what on the last panel said thee president had met with the entire city to explain a strategy on north korea. I just got a little message. He met for 14 minutes with the entire senate he met for 14 minutes. So i dont know what that says about the last panel. Our final panel is on the future of the parties. And let me introduce people briefly. On my far left, no indication of ideology, Steve Schmidt come closer and privacy with the chief savages for the 2008 john mccain in 2004 george w. Bush president ial campaign and youve all seen him commenting rather wisely and about 2016 and beyond. Christian grose, a colleague, social professor of Political Science at usc, author of the awardwinning Book Congress in black and white, race
Are you gonna run for president . I think i just got an f from you. upbeat music upbeat music matt lewis, welcome. Good to be here. Good to see you, so this book, great book was published during the republican primary so its 18 months ago, plus or minus, as we sit here today. Were you right, as you look back, to be worried about conservatism . Absolutely. So it came out in january 2016, right before the Iowa Caucuses so i started writing this maybe in 2014 and wrote a lot of it in 2015. And god, who could have predicted in 2014 and 2015 where wed be today . Right, so donald trump wasnt even running when i first started writing this book, but even without donald trump, i saw that there were problems in conservatism, that there was an identity crisis. And i think what were seeing right now is the manifestation of that. Conservatism, is it populist, does it believe in free trade or does it believe in protectionism . This is just one issue that were still wrestling over. Right, lets get th
Government owned system to bring lethal force to bear . We do that in telecommunications in shipping and a whole bunch of other areas, but weve never done in space. We have to think about that activity. To complete the trip split, i would talk about indemnification. How are we going to use commercial and foreign capabilities, how do we go ahead and identify or expand it to protect those capabilities . We have no policy on that today. We can extend policy but that has not been done yet. We we need to think about that. Some of that is statutory in nature and some as policy in nature and a pick we have to attack those things. Those are three things i would throughout their. Thank you. Im not going to attempt to read the secretarys mind on this so doug will report back as to what was there. I find some of those comments a little mysterious because i think we have plenty of policy. I dont see a large vacuum at the National Policy level. The things i would see, things that are tough are the