denied that he said he in fact, said exactly that. 18 past the hour, chief justice roberts called the leaks draft decision, appalling, since it was revealed, the court could be set to overturn rowe versus wade. a key measure, politico is calling the plan doomed. democrats are trying to get abortion protections codified.
both sides are getting ready. texas, at the epicenter, one of 13 states with so-called trigger laws, banning aborgs with exceptions to the health of the mother is rowe is overturned. he is seizing on the law abbott signed. this isn t about life. this is about control, this is about power, it is about controlling the lives of the women of texas and taking power away from them. abbott is focusing on the draft supreme court opinion itself, urging the court to issue it without delay. i think the majority opinion in this case must be issued this week to show that united states supreme court will not be intimidated. louisiana, would outlaw abortion is rowe is overturned. and the legislator is going forward. criminalize the procedure. meaning the mother and the doctor could be charged with
do either of these efforts have steam? i can agree with the politic o characterization is doomed. one earlier this year, protects additional things, banned in other state, they ll lose joe manchin, and pennsylvania democrat bob casy, cagey about how he would vote on that measure going forward. open debate, whether democrats want to try to use narrower bills, codifying protections that exist because of rowe, open question. as to what republicans might do in the future, the other side of the filibuster debate coin. if republicans take back the majority in both chambers, could they try to push forward broader apportion bans?
overall, that is why we have to have new and better vaccines, they are not perfect. we need new drugs, the ones we have are remarkable, but not perfect. thank you so much for being with us. thank you. still ahead, if rowe versus wade is overturned, a ,
approaches to the law. that doesn t make one right and one wrong, but politics was intricately bound up in how they viewed the law and it s true of the other nine as well. how much do you think is attributed to the majority s decision to let a texas ban on abortion take effect? this public display we re seeing now? you know, i it feels like rowe versus wade is the whole ball game. i agree. one of the things the justices expect is procedural regularity. they argue cases, hear cases and write decisions. what was so outrageous about what happened in the end of august with regard to the texas abortion law is that here, they decided this incredibly important issue. texas is effectively banned abortion and contrary to roe v.