do either of these efforts have steam? i can agree with the politic o characterization is doomed. one earlier this year, protects additional things, banned in other state, they ll lose joe manchin, and pennsylvania democrat bob casy, cagey about how he would vote on that measure going forward. open debate, whether democrats want to try to use narrower bills, codifying protections that exist because of rowe, open question. as to what republicans might do in the future, the other side of the filibuster debate coin. if republicans take back the majority in both chambers, could they try to push forward broader apportion bans?